Talk:KISS notation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:59, 9 June 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits added toc for easier linking ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:46, 10 June 2020 view source Mike Battaglia (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, emailconfirmed, Interface administrators, Sysops 1,399 edits response to middle C stuff Newer edit →
Line 96:		Line 96:

	:: ... or we ask the author of the notation system, [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]], to shed some more light on the reasons for his choice. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)		:: ... or we ask the author of the notation system, [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]], to shed some more light on the reasons for his choice. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

			::: I do advocate for a "middle note = 261.6 pitch standard" for various reasons, and I already have a 1000-word section in the document on absolute pitch standardization regarding why I think it's a good idea. Beyond that, my thought is, tune to whatever pitch standard you want. There is way too much for me to even try to respond to above, and frankly I think some of you people need to calm down. [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 02:46, 10 June 2020 (UTC)