User talk:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ::No I was referring to where you said you might do another one based on 50edo. I'm not a big fan of 43edo so I like the idea of that one, though it is more important of course that the interval names feel right than what edo it's based on --[[User:Gareth.hearne|Gareth.hearne]] ([[User talk:Gareth.hearne|talk]]) 17:42, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
+:::Oh, ok. All meantone edos are quite cute in my opinion, whether grosstone, meanpop or not septimal meantone. The 50edo–based system will of course have 7 more names, which may affect which intermediates (unison–second, second–third, etc.) are present. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 18:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
+:::Of course what edo it's based on can affect the interval names. In 43edo, the major third maps to 14 steps, and the 12edo major third of 400 cents is closest to 14 steps, which maps to "major third" in my naming system. However, in 50edo, the major third maps to 16 steps, and the 12edo major third of 400 cents is closest to 17 steps, meaning that 400 cents would be some sort of a high major third in [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals — 50edo]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 18:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)