Octave reduction: Difference between revisions

m Replaced xen-calc link by an internal one, fixed typo
Sintel bot (talk | contribs)
Fix <math> environments for MathJax v4 (align->aligned, etc.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 40: Line 40:
Example:
Example:


* Octave-reducing 4900/243 can be done by using the formula with <math>r = 4900/243</math>:<br><math>\begin{align}\text{red}(4900/243) &= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-\left\lfloor{\log_2 4900/243}\right\rfloor} \\
* Octave-reducing 4900/243 can be done by using the formula with <math>r = 4900/243</math>:<br><math>\begin{aligned}\text{red}(4900/243) &= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-\left\lfloor{\log_2 4900/243}\right\rfloor} \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-\left\lfloor{4.33375\ldots}\right\rfloor} \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-\left\lfloor{4.33375\ldots}\right\rfloor} \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-4} \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 2^{-4} \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 1/16 \\
&= 4900/243 \cdot 1/16 \\
&= 1225/972\end{align}</math>
&= 1225/972\end{aligned}</math>


=== Logarithmic measures ===
=== Logarithmic measures ===
Line 51: Line 51:
Example:
Example:


* Octave-reducing 412 steps of 97edo can be done by using the formula with <math>r = 412</math>, <math>e = 97</math>:<br><math>\begin{align}\text{red}(412, 97) &= 412 \bmod 97 \\
* Octave-reducing 412 steps of 97edo can be done by using the formula with <math>r = 412</math>, <math>e = 97</math>:<br><math>\begin{aligned}\text{red}(412, 97) &= 412 \bmod 97 \\
&= 24\end{align}</math>
&= 24\end{aligned}</math>


This formula can also be written without the modulo operation: <math>\text{red}(l, e) = r - e\left\lfloor{l/e}\right\rfloor</math>­.
This formula can also be written without the modulo operation: <math>\text{red}(l, e) = r - e\left\lfloor{l/e}\right\rfloor</math>­.
Line 58: Line 58:
Example:
Example:


* Octave-reducing 412 steps of 97edo again:<br><math>\begin{align}\text{red}(412, 97) &= 412 - 97\left\lfloor{412/97}\right\rfloor \\
* Octave-reducing 412 steps of 97edo again:<br><math>\begin{aligned}\text{red}(412, 97) &= 412 - 97\left\lfloor{412/97}\right\rfloor \\
&= 412 - 97\left\lfloor{4.24742\ldots}\right\rfloor \\
&= 412 - 97\left\lfloor{4.24742\ldots}\right\rfloor \\
&= 412 - 97 \cdot 4 \\
&= 412 - 97 \cdot 4 \\
&= 412 - 388 \\
&= 412 - 388 \\
&= 24\end{align}</math>
&= 24\end{aligned}</math>


== Generalization ==
== Generalizations ==
=== Other equaves ===
=== Other equaves ===
Octave reduction is mainly used in the context of octave-equivalent tunings (eg. [[12edo]]), where equivalent notes are separated by octaves. However, this operation can be generalized to any [[Periodic scale|periodic tuning]] by replacing the octave by the interval of equivalence or  ''[[equave]]'' of that tuning.
Octave reduction is mainly used in the context of octave-equivalent tunings (eg. [[12edo]]), where equivalent notes are separated by octaves. However, this operation can be generalized to any [[Periodic scale|periodic tuning]] by replacing the octave by the interval of equivalence or  ''[[equave]]'' of that tuning.


For example, '''tritave reduction''' is the analog of octave reduction in a tritave-equivalent tuning (eg. [[Bohlen-Pierce]]), where the equave is the [[tritave]]. Therefore, a tritave-reduced interval is always obtained through transposition by tritaves, and the reduced interval lies between the unison (1/1) and the tritave (3/1).
For example, '''tritave reduction''' is the analog of octave reduction in a tritave-equivalent tuning (eg. [[Bohlen–Pierce]]), where the equave is the [[tritave]]. Therefore, a tritave-reduced interval is always obtained through transposition by tritaves, and the reduced interval lies between the unison (1/1) and the tritave (3/1).


The general formula for an interval <math>r</math> and an equave <math>e</math> is as follows: <math>\text{red}(r, e) = r \cdot e^{-\left\lfloor{\log_e r}\right\rfloor}</math>­. Note that <math>e</math> is a variable and not Euler's number.
The general formula for an interval <math>r</math> and an equave <math>e</math> is as follows: <math>\text{red}(r, e) = r \cdot e^{-\left\lfloor{\log_e r}\right\rfloor}</math>­. Note that <math>e</math> is a variable and not Euler's number.
Line 76: Line 76:
* Consider a tritave-equivalent tuning; 7/9 is less than 3, so multiply by 3 to get 7/3.
* Consider a tritave-equivalent tuning; 7/9 is less than 3, so multiply by 3 to get 7/3.
* Consider a just perfect fifth-equivalent tuning; <math>\text{red}(81/64, 3/2) = 81/64 \cdot (3/2)^{-\left\lfloor{\log_{3/2} 81/64}\right\rfloor} = 1</math>­.
* Consider a just perfect fifth-equivalent tuning; <math>\text{red}(81/64, 3/2) = 81/64 \cdot (3/2)^{-\left\lfloor{\log_{3/2} 81/64}\right\rfloor} = 1</math>­.
* In the equal-tempered Bohlen-Pierce tuning, a tritave can be expressed as 1300 hekts and a BP fifth down as -500 hekts. This interval is less than the unison, so add 1300 hekts to get 800 hekts.
* In the equal-tempered Bohlen–Pierce tuning, a tritave can be expressed as 1300 hekts and a BP fifth down as -500 hekts. This interval is less than the unison, so add 1300 hekts to get 800 hekts.


=== Balanced reduction ===
=== Balanced reduction ===