Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions

(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 85:

Closing. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:06, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

----

: Should we make garischisma a co-official name or should it be deprecated? [[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]] 16:42, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Line 113:

Line 115:

::: The poll did no help, because it was started '''after''' the command and temp were renamed, so I don’t think it’s an accurate reflection. My concern isn’t the results of the poll, but the fact that it was hastily renamed unlike aberschismic. [[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]] 21:12, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

:::: Wild guesses on the poll's accuracy will not help. In case it's unclear, the poll was closed after 7 days since the 3rd vote, which is how we always did it. There's no precedent of a necessary further delay. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

== Bad process ==

By the way, for the record, I do not disagree with the new name, but rather the process used to decide that new name. [[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]] 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

: '''The poll is official. Please do not move it.''' Feel free to submit an alternative process if you can't agree on this one. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

== Protect ==

Can we protect this page until additional discussion about this temp family other than its name warrants? At this point further discussion is like beating a dead horse. With enough time everyone will use ''septischismic'' and ''garischismic'' will be a distant memory. [[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]] 19:36, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

: Discussion about this temp family other than its name did happen, tho not on the wiki. During the last couple of days, Eufalesio and I were talking about some of the add-17 add-29 and add-31 extensions and how each of them maps to an isomorphic keyboard. You're welcome to join a Discord server or two to find out. Protection will hinder development around this temp family so I'm not gonna do it. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

== Rename androschismic? ==

The old names of some of the temps in this family listed followed a clear corresponsence with temps in the garibaldi family, specifically:

''garischismic'' (former name of septischismic) ~ [[garibaldi]]

''cassaschismic'' (now canonical extension of septischismic) ~ [[cassandra]]

''androschismic'' (not renamed) ~ [[andromeda]]

So, should we rename androschismic to disassociate with andromeda to maintain consistency, or perhaps another reason? [[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]] 22:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

: See the reason for the rename I cited in the reply to Godtone. It's not about disassociation. I think we've agreed earlier that the association with garibaldi isn't a problem to begin with. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 Closing. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:06, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
+----
 : Should we make garischisma a co-official name or should it be deprecated? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 16:42, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
@@ Line 113: / Line 115: @@
 ::: The poll did no help, because it was started '''after''' the command and temp were renamed, so I don’t think it’s an accurate reflection. My concern isn’t the results of the poll, but the fact that it was hastily renamed unlike aberschismic. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 21:12, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
+:::: Wild guesses on the poll's accuracy will not help. In case it's unclear, the poll was closed after 7 days since the 3rd vote, which is how we always did it. There's no precedent of a necessary further delay. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
+== Bad process ==
+By the way, for the record, I do not disagree with the new name, but rather the process used to decide that new name. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
+: '''The poll is official. Please do not move it.''' Feel free to submit an alternative process if you can't agree on this one. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
+== Protect ==
+Can we protect this page until additional discussion about this temp family other than its name warrants? At this point further discussion is like beating a dead horse. With enough time everyone will use ''septischismic'' and ''garischismic'' will be a distant memory. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:36, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
+: Discussion about this temp family other than its name did happen, tho not on the wiki. During the last couple of days, Eufalesio and I were talking about some of the add-17 add-29 and add-31 extensions and how each of them maps to an isomorphic keyboard. You're welcome to join a Discord server or two to find out. Protection will hinder development around this temp family so I'm not gonna do it. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:15, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
+== Rename androschismic? ==
+The old names of some of the temps in this family listed followed a clear corresponsence with temps in the garibaldi family, specifically:
+''garischismic'' (former name of septischismic) ~ [[garibaldi]]<br />
+''cassaschismic'' (now canonical extension of septischismic) ~ [[cassandra]]<br />
+''androschismic'' (not renamed) ~ [[andromeda]]
+So, should we rename androschismic to disassociate with andromeda to maintain consistency, or perhaps another reason? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 22:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
+: See the reason for the rename I cited in the reply to Godtone. It's not about disassociation. I think we've agreed earlier that the association with garibaldi isn't a problem to begin with. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC)