11/10: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - " {{Interval_Edo_Approximation | " to "{{Interval edo approximation|" |
m →Temperaments: Add links to 21/20 and 22/21 |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Interval edo approximation|11/10}} | {{Interval edo approximation|11/10}} | ||
== Temperaments == | == Temperaments == | ||
Using 11/10 as a generator tempering out 4000/3993 (as previously mentioned) leads to | Using 11/10 as a generator and tempering out 4000/3993 (as previously mentioned) leads to temperaments that look like [[porcupine]] but whose harmonies have higher accuracy. A [[semi-octave]] period is exceptionally natural when 11/10 is a generator, because by virtue of making the extremely accurate approximation of the half-octave by [[99/70]], [[9/7]] is found as the period-complement of the generator. Taking this approach, this gives us temperaments in the [[stearnsmic clan]] such as [[pogo]], [[supers]], or [[echidna]], all of which observe [[100/99]][[~]][[121/120]] and find accurate [[11-limit]] and no-13's [[17-limit]] harmonies. The three temperaments have the same mapping in the 2.3.7.11/5.17 subgroup and only differ on the mapping of 5 and 11. Of these, echidna's mapping of the no-13's 17-limit is the simplest. The complexity of pogo rewards you with increased accuracy, being a weak schismic extension, and supers shows an intermediate path between them. | ||
Using sqrt(11/10) (22/21 | Using sqrt(11/10) ([[21/20]]~[[22/21]]) as a generator leads to the low-complexity [[nautilus]] with one period to the octave, and if you use two periods to the octave with this generator you get the high-accuracy temperament [[harry]]; using cbrt(11/10) as a generator leads to [[escapade]] with one period to the octave. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||