Talk:Dyadic chord: Difference between revisions

Line 12:

I can't keep a straight face whilst looking at this section, I'm too childish I may admit, but it's kind of an unfortunate acronym. I propose it to be renamed to something like AnSaS or related.

: I don't share that feeling but maybe that's becuz English isn't my first language. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

: <s>I don't share that feeling but maybe that's becuz English isn't my first language.</s> I use ''saturated suspension'', omitting ''anomalous'' cuz I don't think it conveys anything. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) (Updated [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC))

: <small>P.S. plz remember to sign your comment with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>.</small>

Line 20:

: These are actually plurichords that change their o/u-tonality on different interpretations. I would suggest marking them as both otonal/utonal, which is a meaningful distinction to make from ambitonal. Perhaps it's also good to explicitly mark their plurichord nature and the associated temperaments, if we can find a way to do so. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

== Det chord vs innate comma chord ==

For cataloguing chords of specific temperaments, this distinction is pointless. I have no idea why it was made in these tables in the first place.

The definition of innate comma chords seems problematic, as it's not clear how it's more specific than ordinary high-odd-limit chords.

—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 I can't keep a straight face whilst looking at this section, I'm too childish I may admit, but it's kind of an unfortunate acronym. I propose it to be renamed to something like AnSaS or related.
-: I don't share that feeling but maybe that's becuz English isn't my first language. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
+: <s>I don't share that feeling but maybe that's becuz English isn't my first language.</s> I use ''saturated suspension'', omitting ''anomalous'' cuz I don't think it conveys anything. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) (Updated [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC))
 : <small>P.S. plz remember to sign your comment with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>.</small>
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 : These are actually plurichords that change their o/u-tonality on different interpretations. I would suggest marking them as both otonal/utonal, which is a meaningful distinction to make from ambitonal. Perhaps it's also good to explicitly mark their plurichord nature and the associated temperaments, if we can find a way to do so. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
+== Det chord vs innate comma chord ==
+For cataloguing chords of specific temperaments, this distinction is pointless. I have no idea why it was made in these tables in the first place.
+The definition of innate comma chords seems problematic, as it's not clear how it's more specific than ordinary high-odd-limit chords.
+—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)