Xenharmonic Wiki

Talk:Schismic–commatic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

FloraC (talk | contribs)

4 user groups
27,068 edits
VisualWikitext
Hkm (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled
1,061 edits
→Merge: new section
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
:: Oops, typo.  You're right -- I meant to put Syntonic-Schismic or Schismic-Syntonic.  Fixing this in the title and in my original comment.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
:: Oops, typo.  You're right -- I meant to put Syntonic-Schismic or Schismic-Syntonic.  Fixing this in the title and in my original comment.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)


== Merge ==
== 5-limit gracecordial ==
 
This restriction should not be canonical as both 113 & 125 and 149 & 161 are viable extensions and the optimum is around 137edo. Now there are "biscordial" and "triscordial" (idk why the ''s''), I think the restriction of gracecordial can be called ''monocordial''. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:08, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
This page and the page "List of edo-distinct 12f rank two temperaments" have duplicate content, and (as I mentioned on the XA Discord) should be merged.
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Schismic–commatic_equivalence_continuum"
Return to "Schismic–commatic equivalence continuum" page.