Talk:69edo: Difference between revisions

Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
→Inconsistency: Error between EDO interval and just interval is useful
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''


<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
== Inconsistency ==
In the proposed names section of the intervals, 7/5 is at 33 steps, while 10/7 is 35, and they sum up to 68 steps , not 69. This needs to be fixed ASAP.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)


----
: The table should go imo. Edos and edosteps don't need to be named anyway. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)


== Synch-Meantone ==
:: The table does have a useful idea (even if the particular implementation in this case is buggy), in that it gives the error between the just interval and the EDO interval. This is something that most other interval tables should do, but do not. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 13:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
69edo's fifth is extremely close to that of "Synch-Meantone" in Scala, or Wilson equal beating meantone. Thought that was interesting.
 
Perhaps someone could help figure out how perceptually "off" 69edo is from the real thing? Like, how long does it take for the beat-rates of the fifth and thirds to noticeably go out of sync..
 
- '''kai.lugheidh''' September 23, 2017, 10:21:39 PM UTC-0700
----
Return to "69edo" page.