186zpi: Difference between revisions

Contribution (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fredg999 (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "Ups and Downs Notation" to "Ups and downs notation"
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''186 zeta peak index''' (abbreviated '''186zpi'''), is the [[Equal-step tuning|equal-step]] [[tuning system]] obtained from the 186st [[Zeta peak index|peak]] of the [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning|Riemann zeta function]].
'''186 zeta peak index''' (abbreviated '''186zpi'''), is the [[Equal-step tuning|equal-step]] [[tuning system]] obtained from the 186st [[Zeta peak index|peak]] of the [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning|Riemann zeta function]].


{| class="wikitable"
{{ZPI
! colspan="3" | Tuning
| zpi = 186
! colspan="3" | Strength
| steps = 41.3438354846780
! colspan="2" | Closest EDO
| step size = 29.0248832971658
! colspan="2" | Integer limit
| height = 1.876590
|-
| integral = 0.241233
! ZPI
| gap = 11.567493
! Steps per octave
| edo = 41edo
! Step size (cents)
| octave = 1190.02021518380
! Height
| consistent = 2
! Integral
| distinct = 2
! Gap
}}
! EDO
! Octave (cents)
! Consistent
! Distinct
|-
| [[186zpi]]
| 41.3438354846780
| 29.0248832971658
| 1.876590
| 0.241233
| 11.567493
| [[41edo]]
| 1190.02021518380
| 2
| 2
|}


== Theory ==
== Theory ==
=== Record on the Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed ===
=== Record on the Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed ===
'''186zpi''' sets a height record on the Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed. The previous record is [[125zpi]] and the next one is [[565zpi]]. It is important to highlight that the optimal equal tunings obtained by excluding the prime numbers 2 and 3 from the Riemann zeta function differs very slightly from the optimal equal tuning corresponding to the same peaks on the unmodified Riemann zeta function.
'''186zpi''' sets a height record on the Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed. The previous record is [[125zpi]] and the next one is [[565zpi]]. It is important to highlight that the optimal equal tunings obtained by excluding the prime numbers 2 and 3 from the Riemann zeta function differs very slightly from the optimal equal tuning corresponding to the same peaks on the unmodified Riemann zeta function.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
! colspan="6" |Unmodified Riemann zeta function
|-
! colspan="5" |Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed
! colspan="6" | Unmodified Riemann zeta function
! colspan="5" | Riemann zeta function with primes 2 and 3 removed
|-
|-
! colspan="3" | Tuning
! colspan="3" | Tuning
Line 61: Line 45:
| 30.6006474885974
| 30.6006474885974
| 39.2148564976330
| 39.2148564976330
|1.468164
| 1.468164
| [[31edo]]
| [[31edo]]
| 1215.66055142662
| 1215.66055142662
| 30.5974484926723
| 30.5974484926723
| 39.2189564527704
| 39.2189564527704
|3.769318
| 3.769318
| [[31edo]]
| [[31edo]]
| 1215.78765003588
| 1215.78765003588
|-
|-
|[[186zpi]]
| [[186zpi]]
|41.3438354846780
| 41.3438354846780
|29.0248832971658
| 29.0248832971658
|1.876590
| 1.876590
|[[41edo]]
| [[41edo]]
|1190.02021518380
| 1190.02021518380
|41.3477989230936
| 41.3477989230936
|29.0221010852836
| 29.0221010852836
|4.469823
| 4.469823
|[[41edo]]
| [[41edo]]
|1189.90614449663
| 1189.90614449663
|-
|-
|[[565zpi]]
| [[565zpi]]
|98.6209462564991
| 98.6209462564991
|12.1678005084130
| 12.1678005084130
|2.305330
| 2.305330
|[[99edo]]
| [[99edo]]
|1204.61225033289
| 1204.61225033289
|98.6257548378926
| 98.6257548378926
|12.1672072570942
| 12.1672072570942
|4.883729
| 4.883729
|[[99edo]]
| [[99edo]]
|1204.55351845233
| 1204.55351845233
|}
|}


Line 108: Line 92:


{| class="wikitable center-1 right-2 left-3 center-4 center-5"
{| class="wikitable center-1 right-2 left-3 center-4 center-5"
|+ style="white-space:nowrap" | Intervals in 186zpi
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Intervals in 186zpi
|-
|-
| colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | JI ratios are comprised of [[32-integer-limit]] ratios,<br>and are stylized as follows to indicate their accuracy:
| colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | JI ratios are comprised of [[32-integer-limit]] ratios,<br>and are stylized as follows to indicate their accuracy:
Line 122: Line 106:
! Cents
! Cents
! Ratios
! Ratios
! Ups and Downs Notation
! Ups and downs notation
! Step
! Step
|-
|-