Talk:Schisma: Difference between revisions
→Lemma: re |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: I'm hesitant as I noticed some (Sagittal notation users in particular) would use the term ''schisma'' for a category of commas regarding size, somewhat like ''diesis''. Perhaps there should be a disambiguation. Same for ''kleisma''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | : I'm hesitant as I noticed some (Sagittal notation users in particular) would use the term ''schisma'' for a category of commas regarding size, somewhat like ''diesis''. Perhaps there should be a disambiguation. Same for ''kleisma''. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Good point! Concerning [[kleisma]], I started [[Talk:Kleisma#Disambiguation]]. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== 887/886 == | |||
> Since it is extremely close to the superparticular ratio 887/886 {{nowrap|(2<sup>-1</sup> 443<sup>-1</sup> 887)}}, it is used interchangably with this interval. | |||
Doesn't seem notable at all. | |||
[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:34, 6 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
: I added this because you may find it in some of Helmholtz' writing and it is extremely confusing if you don't know that he is using 887/886 to refer to the schisma. I agree it's weird and I don't really understand why he did that. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:41, 6 August 2025 (UTC) | |||