26th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Eliora (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
All temperaments on this page have a period that is [[Fractional-octave temperaments|1/26th of an octave]], i.e. their [[pergen]] is (P8/26, P5). However, the {{monzo| -41 26 }} comma is not tempered out. Thus the 3/2 is not that of [[26edo]]. However, 7/4 is, as is 11/8 in the Bosonic temperaments.
{{Technical data page}}
{{Infobox fractional-octave|26}}
All temperaments on this page have a period that is [[Fractional-octave temperaments|1/26th of an octave]]. However, the {{monzo| -41 26 }} comma is not tempered out. Thus the 3/2 is not that of [[26edo]]. However, 7/4 is, as is 11/8 in the Bosonic temperaments.


26edo is very accurate for 7th harmonic, the 26-7-comma ({{monzo|73 0 0 -26}}, the amount by which 26 septimal whole tones ([[8/7]]) exceed 5 octaves) is tempered out by 26-fold multiple EDOs up to 1456 (such as [[26edo|26]], [[130edo|130]], [[286edo|286]] or [[546edo|546]] EDO).
26edo is very accurate for 7th harmonic, the [[26-7-comma]] ({{monzo|73 0 0 -26}}, the amount by which 26 septimal whole tones ([[8/7]]) exceed 5 octaves) is tempered out by 26-fold multiple EDOs up to 1456 (such as [[26edo|26]], [[130edo|130]], [[286edo|286]] or [[546edo|546]] EDO).


== Bosonic ==
== Bosonic ==
Line 13: Line 15:


Mapping generators: ~36/35, ~3
Mapping generators: ~36/35, ~3
{{Multival|legend=1|26 52 0 22 -73 -146}}


[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.250


{{Val list|legend=1| 26, 130, 546, 676, 806c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 130, 546, 676, 806c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.155827
[[Badness]]: 0.155827
Line 31: Line 31:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.559


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 26, 104c, 130 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }}


Badness: 0.065219
Badness: 0.065219
Line 44: Line 44:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.546


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 26, 104c, 130 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 26, 104c, 130 }}


Badness: 0.032946
Badness: 0.032946
Line 57: Line 57:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.077


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 130, 286, 416, 546, 1508bcd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 1508bcd }}


Badness: 0.090642
Badness: 0.090642
Line 70: Line 70:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.038


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 130, 286, 416, 546, 962bf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 130, 286, 416, 546, 962bf }}


Badness: 0.043581
Badness: 0.043581
Line 87: Line 87:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]):  ~3/2 = 702.017
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]):  ~3/2 = 702.017


Vals: {{EDOs|130, 364, 494, 624}}, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|130, 364, 494, 624}}, ...


=== 11-limit ===
=== 11-limit ===
Line 100: Line 100:
Optimal tuning (CTE):  ~3/2 = 702.017
Optimal tuning (CTE):  ~3/2 = 702.017


Vals: 130, 364, 494, 624, ...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|130, 364, 494, 624}}, ...


=== 13-limit ===
=== 13-limit ===
Line 113: Line 113:
Optimal tuning (CTE):  ~3/2 = 702.018
Optimal tuning (CTE):  ~3/2 = 702.018


Vals: 130, 364, 494, 624,...
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|130, 364, 494, 624}}, ...
 
{{Navbox fractional-octave}}
 
[[Category:26edo]]
[[Category:26edo]]
[[Category:Temperament collections]]
[[Category:Rank 2]]