Highly composite equal division: Difference between revisions
→Highly composite edf: in fact, both are random. Edfs tend to correspond to an edo simply becuz there are fewer edfs. |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Highly composite edo == | == Highly composite edo == | ||
[[12edo]], the predominantly used tuning in the world today, is the only known | [[12edo]], the predominantly used tuning in the world today, is currently the only known non-trivial highly composite edo that holds any zeta records and the only one with a step size above the [[just-noticeable difference]]. Others have not been found yet, and given the lack of such edos until hundreds of thousands it is likely if another one is found, it would not be of any harmonic use since its amount of steps would be astronomical. | ||
=== The first 41 highly composite edos === | === The first 41 highly composite edos === | ||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
== Generalization == | == Generalization == | ||
{{Todo|inline=1|split page|comment=Move the definitions to [[Highly composite number]] and discuss the properties without regards to equal divisions. }} | |||
=== Extensions === | === Extensions === | ||
It is possible to define ''N''-generalized highly composite numbers as a set of numbers, for which sum of powers of divisors relative to the number is greater than all the ones before it. This means that 0-generalized highly composite numbers are plain highly composite numbers, 1-generalized are superabundant numbers, etc. | It is possible to define ''N''-generalized highly composite numbers as a set of numbers, for which sum of powers of divisors relative to the number is greater than all the ones before it. This means that 0-generalized highly composite numbers are plain highly composite numbers, 1-generalized are superabundant numbers, etc. |