Just intonation subgroup: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
i so want to remove "formal prime" here but it's actually used on the discord :sob:
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
A '''just intonation subgroup''' is a {{w|Free abelian group|group}} generated by a finite set of positive rational numbers via arbitrary multiplications and divisions. Using subgroups implies a way to organize [[just intonation]] intervals such that they form a lattice. Therefore it is closely related to [[regular temperament theory]].  
A '''just intonation subgroup''' is a {{w|Free abelian group|group}} generated by a finite set of positive rational numbers via arbitrary multiplications and divisions. Using subgroups implies a way to organize [[just intonation]] intervals such that they form a lattice. Therefore it is closely related to [[regular temperament theory]].  


Just intonation subgroups can be described by listing their [[generator]]s with dots between them; we use said convention below. In standard mathematical notation, let ''c''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''c''<sub>''r''</sub> be positive reals, and suppose ''v''<sub>''k''</sub> is the musical interval of log<sub>2</sub>(''c''<sub>''k''</sub>) octaves. Then
Just intonation subgroups can be described by listing their [[generator]]s with full stops between them; we use said convention below. In standard mathematical notation, let ''c''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''c''<sub>''r''</sub> be positive reals, and suppose ''v''<sub>''k''</sub> is the musical interval of log<sub>2</sub>(''c''<sub>''k''</sub>) octaves. Then


<math>c_1.c_2.\cdots.c_r := \operatorname{span}_\mathbb{Z} \{v_1, ..., v_k\}.</math>
<math>c_1.c_2.\cdots.c_r := \operatorname{span}_\mathbb{Z} \{v_1, ..., v_k\}.</math>
Line 13: Line 13:
There are three categories of subgroups:
There are three categories of subgroups:


* Prime subgroups (e.g. 2.3.7) contain only primes
* '''Prime subgroups''' (e.g. 2.3.7) contain only primes
* Composite subgroups (e.g. 2.5.9) contain composite numbers and perhaps prime numbers too
* '''Composite subgroups''' (e.g. 2.9.5) contain composite numbers and perhaps prime numbers too
* Fractional subgroups (e.g. 2.3.7/5) contain fractional numbers and perhaps prime and/or composite numbers too
* '''Fractional subgroups''' (e.g. 2.3.7/5) contain fractional numbers and perhaps prime and/or composite numbers too


For composite and fractional subgroups, not all combinations of numbers are mathematically valid [[basis|bases]] for subgroups. For example, 2.3.9 has a redundant generator 9, and both 2.3.15 and 2.3.5/3 can be simplified to 2.3.5.
For composite and fractional subgroups, not all combinations of numbers are mathematically valid [[basis|bases]] for subgroups. For example, 2.3.9 has a redundant generator 9, and both 2.3.15 and 2.3.5/3 can be simplified to 2.3.5.
Line 21: Line 21:
A prime subgroup that does not omit any primes < ''p'' (e.g. 2.3.5, 2.3.5.7, 2.3.5.7.11, etc. but not 2.3.7 or 3.5.7) is simply called [[Harmonic limit|''p''-limit JI]]. It is customary of just intonation subgroups to refer only to prime subgroups that do omit such primes, as well as the other two categories.
A prime subgroup that does not omit any primes < ''p'' (e.g. 2.3.5, 2.3.5.7, 2.3.5.7.11, etc. but not 2.3.7 or 3.5.7) is simply called [[Harmonic limit|''p''-limit JI]]. It is customary of just intonation subgroups to refer only to prime subgroups that do omit such primes, as well as the other two categories.


The following terminology has been proposed for streamlining pedagogy: Given a subgroup written as generated by a fixed (non-redundant) set: ''a''.''b''.''c''.[…].''d'', call any member of this set a '''basis element''', '''structural prime''', or '''formal prime'''.<ref>The meaning of "formal" this term is using is "of external form or structure, rather than nature or content", which is to say that a formal prime is not necessarily ''actually'' a prime, but we treat them as if they were. The original coiner of this term, [[Inthar]], has recommended its disuse, in favor of the mathematically accurate and generic "basis element", or possibly something else which indicates the co-uniqueness of the elements.</ref> For example, if the group is written 2.5/3.7/3, the basis elements are 2, 5/3 and 7/3.
The following terminology has been proposed for streamlining pedagogy: Given a subgroup written as generated by a fixed (non-redundant) set: ''a''.''b''.''c''.[…].''d'', call any member of this set a '''basis element''', '''structural prime''', or "'''formal prime'''".<ref>The meaning of "formal" this term is using is "of external form or structure, rather than nature or content", which is to say that a formal prime is not necessarily ''actually'' a prime, but we treat them as if they were. The original coiner of this term, [[Inthar]], has recommended its disuse, in favor of the mathematically accurate and generic "basis element", or possibly something else which indicates the co-uniqueness of the elements.</ref> For example, if the group is written 2.5/3.7/3, the basis elements are 2, 5/3 and 7/3.


== Normalization ==
== Normalization ==
A canonical naming system for just intonation subgroups is to give a [[Normal lists #Normal interval list|normal interval list]] for the generators of the group, which will also show the [[Wikipedia: Rank of an abelian group|rank]] of the group by the number of generators in the list (the [[Hermite normal form]] should be used here, not the [[canonical form]], because in the case of subgroups, [[enfactoring]] is sometimes desirable, such as in the subgroup 2.9.7 which should not be reduced to 2.3.7 by subgroup canonicalization). Below we give some of the more interesting subgroup systems. If a scale is given with the system, it means the subgroup is generated by the notes of the scale.  
A canonical naming system for just intonation subgroups is to give a [[Normal lists #Normal interval lists|normal interval list]] for the generators of the group, which will also show the [[Wikipedia: Rank of an abelian group|rank]] of the group by the number of generators in the list (the [[Hermite normal form]] should be used here, not the [[canonical form]], because in the case of subgroups, [[enfactoring]] is sometimes desirable, such as in the subgroup 2.9.7 which should not be reduced to 2.3.7 by subgroup canonicalization). Below we give some of the more interesting subgroup systems. If a scale is given with the system, it means the subgroup is generated by the notes of the scale.


== Index ==
== Index ==
Line 66: Line 66:
; 2.9/5.9/7:
; 2.9/5.9/7:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 6, 21, 27, 33, 105, 138, 171, 1848, 2019, 2190, 2361, 2532, 2703, 2874, 3045, 3216, 3387, 3558 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 6, 21, 27, 33, 105, 138, 171, 1848, 2019, 2190, 2361, 2532, 2703, 2874, 3045, 3216, 3387, 3558 }}
* ''Terrain temperament'' subgroup, see [[Chromatic pairs #Terrain]]
* ''Terrain temperament'' subgroup, see [[Subgroup temperaments #Terrain]]


; 3.5.7:
; 3.5.7:
Line 90: Line 90:
; 2.3.7.11:
; 2.3.7.11:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 9, 17, 26, 31, 41, 46, 63, 72, 135 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 9, 17, 26, 31, 41, 46, 63, 72, 135 }}
* The [[Chromatic pairs#Radon|Radon temperament]] subgroup, generated by the Ptolemy Intense Chromatic [22/21, 8/7, 4/3, 3/2, 11/7, 12/7, 2/1]
* The [[Gamelismic clan#Radon|Radon temperament]] subgroup, generated by the Ptolemy Intense Chromatic [22/21, 8/7, 4/3, 3/2, 11/7, 12/7, 2/1]
* See: [[Gallery of 2.3.7.11 Subgroup Scales]]
* See: [[Gallery of 2.3.7.11 Subgroup Scales]]


Line 98: Line 98:
; 2.5/3.7/3.11/3:
; 2.5/3.7/3.11/3:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 33, 41, 49, 57, 106, 204, 253 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 33, 41, 49, 57, 106, 204, 253 }}
* The [[Chromatic_pairs#Indium|Indium temperament]] subgroup.
* The [[Subgroup temperaments#Indium|Indium temperament]] subgroup.


=== 13-limit subgroups ===
=== 13-limit subgroups ===
Line 108: Line 108:
; 2.3.5.13:
; 2.3.5.13:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 15, 19, 34, 53, 87, 130, 140, 246, 270 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 15, 19, 34, 53, 87, 130, 140, 246, 270 }}
* The [[Chromatic pairs#Cata|Cata]], [[The Archipelago#Trinidad|Trinidad]] and [[The Archipelago#Parizekmic|Parizekmic]] temperaments subgroup.
* The [[Kleismic family#Cata|Cata]], [[The Archipelago#Trinidad|Trinidad]] and [[The Archipelago#Parizekmic|Parizekmic]] temperaments subgroup.


; 2.3.7.13:
; 2.3.7.13:
Line 118: Line 118:
; 2.5.7.13:
; 2.5.7.13:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 27, 37, 84, 121, 400 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 27, 37, 84, 121, 400 }}
* The [[Chromatic_pairs#Huntington|Huntington temperament]] subgroup.
* The [[No-threes subgroup temperaments#Huntington|Huntington temperament]] subgroup.


; 2.5.7.11.13:
; 2.5.7.11.13:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 6, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 6, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31, 37 }}
* The [[Chromatic_pairs#Roulette|Roulette temperament]] subgroup
* The [[Hemimean clan#Roulette|Roulette temperament]] subgroup


; 2.3.13/5:
; 2.3.13/5:
Line 130: Line 130:
; 2.3.11/5.13/5:
; 2.3.11/5.13/5:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29 }}
* The [[Chromatic pairs#Bridgetown|Bridgetown temperament]] subgroup.
* The [[Subgroup temperaments#Bridgetown|Bridgetown temperament]] subgroup.


; 2.3.11/7.13/7:
; 2.3.11/7.13/7:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 7, 12, 17, 29, 46, 75, 196, 271 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 7, 12, 17, 29, 46, 75, 196, 271 }}
* The [[Chromatic pairs#Pepperoni|Pepperoni temperament]] subgroup.
* The [[Subgroup temperaments#Pepperoni|Pepperoni temperament]] subgroup.


; 2.7/5.11/5.13/5:
; 2.7/5.11/5.13/5:
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 8, 21, 29, 37, 66, 169, 235 }}
* {{EDOs|legend=1| 5, 8, 21, 29, 37, 66, 169, 235 }}
* The [[Chromatic pairs#Tridec|Tridec temperament]] subgroup.
* The [[Subgroup temperaments#Tridec|Tridec temperament]] subgroup.


=== Higher-limit subgroups ===
=== Higher-limit subgroups ===