|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
|
| |
|
| <span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
| | == Query on mention of 36/35 -- is 36/25 meant? == |
|
| |
|
| ----
| | There are references to 36/35 and 10/7 differing by 126/125, the starling comma. Could this mean 36/25, or (6/5)^2? [[User:Mschulter1325|Mschulter1325]] 07:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| == Equal Beating Tunings of Essentially Tempered Chords ==
| | : Yeah, 36/25 and 10/7 differ by 126/125. I just checked in Wolfram Alpha. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC) |
| I've been recently spending quite a bit of time listening to these chords with the woodwinds section available in the latest Logic Express. When I reached the essentially tempered chords, realizing that they can't be tuned beatless, wondered if they could be tuned such that each interval has the same beat. Turns out in many cases they can, and have rational solutions. In my opinion they sound better this way. There's a fairly straightforward way of solving this for an arbitrary number of notes. Some of you probably already know of it. | |
|
| |
|
| As a concrete example, the Marvel chord 1/1-5/4-7/5-14/9 can be tempered as 1/1-121/97-136/97-151/97. With 220 Hz as 1/1, all intervals will beat at about 2.3 Hz. That's calculated based on the idea that the ratio of each pair of fractions approximates 5/4, 9/8, 10/9, and 9/7 respectively.
| | == Move to "dyadically consonant chord" == |
|
| |
|
| Is there already a page for an idea like this? If not, would someone please direct me to the best place to start one?
| | To me, "dyadic chord" most intuitively means "chord that is a dyad". |
| | |
| - '''BryceHathaway''' November 06, 2015, 03:31:13 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == battaglia chord ==
| |
| 15-limit or 19-limit?
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' October 19, 2011, 12:32:32 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == hendrix chord ==
| |
| is it 7-limit or 19-limit? | |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' October 19, 2011, 12:30:09 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == interesting overview ==
| |
| thank you, Gene :-)
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' October 19, 2011, 12:21:49 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Orwell ==
| |
| Are we sticking to only codimension 1 here? Because if not, 1/1-7/6-11/8-8/5 deserves a shoutout, perhaps even 1/1-7/6-11/8-8/5-15/8-11/10-9/7-3/2.
| |
| | |
| Maybe in the future it would be nice to have a 2D table organizing everything by limit and codimension.
| |
| | |
| - '''mbattaglia1''' September 17, 2011, 01:46:26 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| I forgot to add "orwell tetrad" to the list, though the page around for while.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' September 17, 2011, 02:13:05 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |