Talk:Diamond-mos notation: Difference between revisions

TallKite (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Just glancing at this, haven't read through it yet. Perhaps ^ could be called "caret" and v could be "vee", analogous to am and at. This might help avoid confusion with my usa..."
 
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
m ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Diamond–MOS notation to Talk:Diamond-mos notation over redirect
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Just glancing at this, haven't read through it yet. Perhaps ^ could be called "caret" and v could be "vee", analogous to am and at. This might help avoid confusion with my usage of ups and downs. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 03:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Just glancing at this, haven't read through it yet. Perhaps ^ could be called "caret" and v could be "vee", analogous to am and at. This might help avoid confusion with my usage of ups and downs. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 03:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
: I would argue that ups and downs have gotten consensus in the community that goes beyond the rules of your original standard. Diamond-mos ups and downs have the same meaning on the staff as yours (most of the time?); only the text rules are different. If people use ups and downs one way or the other, they can clarify their use by saying which standard they're using. I think us using ups and downs helps cut down on memorization, since it's an element most microtonalists already know. [[User:SupahstarSaga|SupahstarSaga]] ([[User talk:SupahstarSaga|talk]]) 17:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
== Special status of diatonic ==
I wanted to know, why does diatonic use standard notation (ABC, #/b) while non-diatonic uses different notation (JKL, &/@)? It can't be for distinctiveness purposes because everything non-diatonic uses identical notation. So if a lot of MOSes will be sharing the same notation anyway, we could use the "ABC" notation for both diatonic and non-diatonic MOS to avoid people having to learn new note names and accidentals. After all, this notation is said to attempt to "keep new symbols and memorization required to a minimum."
There are also other places where 5L 2s has a different treatment in this notation, like allowing equalized and collapsed for diatonic but not other MOSes.
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Return to "Diamond-mos notation" page.