Talk:Superpyth–22 equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions

Created page with "== Suggested rename and re-parametrization == This should be renamed and re-parametrized to 22-superpyth equivalence continuum: {| class="wikitable center-1 center-2" |+Temp..."
 
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
m ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Superpyth-22 equivalence continuum to Talk:Superpyth–22 equivalence continuum: The dash in titles like these should be an en dash, not a hyphen-minus, since "superpyth" does not modify "22"
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Suggested rename and re-parametrization ==
== Suggested rename and re-parametrization ==
This should be renamed and re-parametrized to 22-superpyth equivalence continuum:  
This should be renamed and re-parametrized to superpyth-22 equivalence continuum:  


{| class="wikitable center-1 center-2"
{| class="wikitable center-1"
|+Temperaments in the continuum
|+Temperaments in the continuum
|-
|-
Line 25: Line 25:
| [[Diaschismic]]
| [[Diaschismic]]
| 2048/2025
| 2048/2025
| {{Monzo| -11 4 2 }}
| {{Monzo| 11 -4 -2 }}
|-
|-
| 3
| 3
Line 48: Line 48:
|}
|}


Or doing it backwards, the 22-quasisuper equivalence continuum:  
Or doing it backwards, the quasisuper-22 equivalence continuum:  


{| class="wikitable center-1 center-2"
{| class="wikitable center-1"
|+Temperaments in the continuum
|+Temperaments in the continuum
|-
|-
Line 73: Line 73:
| [[Diaschismic]]
| [[Diaschismic]]
| 2048/2025
| 2048/2025
| {{Monzo| -11 4 2 }}
| {{Monzo| 11 -4 -2 }}
|-
|-
| 3
| 3
| 22 & 29c
| 22 & 29c
| 250/243
|  
| {{Monzo| -34 17 3 }}
| {{Monzo| 34 -17 -3 }}
|-
|-
|…
|…
Line 91: Line 91:
|}
|}


Or maybe we should call it superpyth-quasisuper based on the two "order-1" temperaments? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Or maybe we should call it superpyth-quasisuper based on the two "order-1" temperaments?  
 
[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 
Update: I've found some simple rules to follow:
# ''n'' = 0 should correspond to a 3-limit comma (or in general, the comma that's independent of the last prime).
# ''n'' = 1 should correspond to 1 or -1 in the next prime, and the comma should be smaller than that of ''n'' = 0. That seems to narrow the number of candidates down to 2. As we set one of them as ''n'' = 1, the other would be ''n'' = inf and vice versa.
# As we decide which is ''n'' = 1 and which ''n'' = inf, we should try to keep the just value of ''n'' greater than 2. We might wanna present both tables in the page, one by ''n'', and the other would be ''n''/(''n'' + 1).
 
So in this case the answer seems to be superpyth-22. Superpyth is also the smaller comma, as expected.
 
[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 
 
Honestly, you probably know more about this than I do, so I think we should go with your idea. You can move the page and implement your idea if you want. I mainly just wanted to see the hyper-accurate temperaments that can be extracted from 22-edo. I created this page to extend your idea of equivalence continua to 22-edo, a somewhat accurate temperament for 7-limit.
 
--[[User:Royalmilktea|Royalmilktea]] ([[User talk:Royalmilktea|talk]]) 06:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Return to "Superpyth–22 equivalence continuum" page.