Talk:List of octave-reduced harmonics: Difference between revisions
→Remove 2?: new section |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC) | If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Missing Harmonics == | |||
83 and 107 are missing --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 23:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |