Talk:List of octave-reduced harmonics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | |||
== Remove 2? == | |||
-- | If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
: I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
I' | |||
- | == Missing Harmonics == | ||
83 and 107 are missing --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 23:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:19, 21 October 2024
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Remove 2?
If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --Xenwolf (talk) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --Aura (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Missing Harmonics
83 and 107 are missing --TallKite (talk) 23:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)