Relative interval error: Difference between revisions
m Restylize and recategorize |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The '''relative error''' of an [[interval]] in an [[edo]] is the interval's [[error]] in cents divided by the cents of an edostep, or equivalently stated, the error in [[relative cent]]s. | The '''relative error''' of an [[interval]] in an [[edo]] is the interval's [[error]] in cents divided by the cents of an edostep, or equivalently stated, the error in [[relative cent]]s. | ||
For example, in 24edo, 3/2 has an absolute error of about | For example, in 24edo, 3/2 has an absolute error of about −2¢, meaning that the nearest interval in the edo is about 2¢ flat of 3/2. One edostep is 50¢, and −2 / 50 = −0.04, therefore the relative error is about −4% or −4 relative cents. In contrast, 12edo has the same absolute error, but a smaller relative error of −2%. (In fact, 12edo always has the same relative and absolute interval error since it is the basis for the cent.) | ||
== Computation == | == Computation == | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The unit of relative error is ''relative cent'' or ''percent''. | The unit of relative error is ''relative cent'' or ''percent''. | ||
With direct approximation via the ratio's cents, the relative error ranges from | With direct approximation via the ratio's cents, the relative error ranges from −50% to +50%. With a [[val]] mapping via [[patent val]] or other vals, it can be greater. | ||
=== In val mapping === | === In val mapping === | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=== Example === | === Example === | ||
Let us try finding the relative error of 6/5 in 19edo's patent val. We may first find the errors of 2/1, 3/1 and 5/1 in 19edo. They are 0, | Let us try finding the relative error of 6/5 in 19edo's patent val. We may first find the errors of 2/1, 3/1 and 5/1 in 19edo. They are 0, −11.43% and −11.66%, respectively. Since 6/5 = (2/1)(3/1) / (5/1), its error is 0 + (−11.43%) − (−11.66%) = 0.23%. That shows 19edo has fairly flat fifths and major thirds, yet they cancel out when it comes to minor thirds and results in a very accurate approximation. | ||
== Linearity == | == Linearity == | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
We see how the errors of a sharp tending system and a flat tending system cancel out each other by the sum, and result in a much more accurate equal temperament. | We see how the errors of a sharp tending system and a flat tending system cancel out each other by the sum, and result in a much more accurate equal temperament. | ||
It is somewhat applicable to direct approximation, but with some quirks. If the error exceeds the range of | It is somewhat applicable to direct approximation, but with some quirks. If the error exceeds the range of −50% to +50%, it indicates that there is a discrepancy in val mapping and direct approximation. In this case, you need to modulo the result by 100%. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |