Misty family: Difference between revisions

Normalization; POTE -> CTE; review optimal ET sequences
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Re-added POTE tunings
Line 17: Line 17:


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~512/405 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.2481
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~512/405 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.2481
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~512/405 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.111


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 285, 384, 483c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 51, 63, 75, 87, 99, 285, 384, 483c }}
Line 81: Line 83:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3127
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3127
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.210


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, …, 87, 99e, 186e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, …, 87, 99e, 186e }}
Line 94: Line 98:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3859
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3859
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.303


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, …, 87, 186ef }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, …, 87, 186ef }}
Line 107: Line 113:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3686
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3686
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.233


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efg }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efg }}
Line 120: Line 128:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~24/19 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3626
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~24/19 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3626
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~34/27 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.253


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efgh }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 87, 99ef, 186efgh }}
Line 133: Line 143:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3285
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.3285
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 703.311


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 87, 186e, 273e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 87, 186e, 273e }}
Line 148: Line 160:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.0864
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.0864
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.9764


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 174e, 186, 198, 408cde, 606bcde }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 174e, 186, 198, 408cde, 606bcde }}
Line 161: Line 175:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.1045
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.1045
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 703.0087


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 174ef, 186, 198 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 174ef, 186, 198 }}
Line 208: Line 224:


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~80/63 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.3694
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~80/63 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.3694
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~80/63 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.118


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 39c, 51, 63, 75 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 39c, 51, 63, 75 }}
Line 223: Line 241:


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.6253
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.6253
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~44/35 = 1\3, ~3/2 = 704.411


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 39ce, 51, 63, 138de }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 39ce, 51, 63, 138de }}