Talk:256/255: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
::: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC) | ::: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: Firstly, it is not my name proposal; I mentioned that it was proposed by Starshine on the XA Discord, I merely championed the name. Secondly, please do not add your modified versions of the proposal to the pages given neither I nor anyone else have touched the page up until this point with regards to the proposal and given you have not waited for a consensus for the proposal and given I have taken every liberty I can of waiting for consensus and the full range of reasonings/opinions to come in. While I am not entirely against "charsmic" instead of "charismic", as Fumica said it defies the -isma -ic -ismic convention and even from an aesthetic point of view to me it is unfavourable to have "rsm" in a name especially given it generates confusion with the standard. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC) | ::: Firstly, it is not my name proposal; I mentioned that it was proposed by Starshine on the [[XA Discord]], I merely championed the name. Secondly, please do not add your modified versions of the proposal to the pages given neither I nor anyone else have touched the page up until this point with regards to the proposal and given you have not waited for a consensus for the proposal and given I have taken every liberty I can of waiting for consensus and the full range of reasonings/opinions to come in. While I am not entirely against "charsmic" instead of "charismic", as Fumica said it defies the -isma -ic -ismic convention and even from an aesthetic point of view to me it is unfavourable to have "rsm" in a name especially given it generates confusion with the standard. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::: Apologies, I didn't realize someone had changed the Horcrux names already so what I said is not fully true. I also want to make clear that I do appreciate your consideration. I think much of this would go more smoothly if there was a more official/standard process for names and the occasional renames. I am working on that right now. I would be grateful if anyone wants to improve what I will add. Ideally though, if it is not a convention that will likely be taken as uncontroversial, then discuss it first in the corresponding talk page. Kind regards, --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 18:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC) |