Talk:136/135: Difference between revisions
re |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I think superpyth implies a mapping of 17 due to its whole tone fitting ~17/15 very well, but calling it ''diatonisma'' for that reason is indeed quite a stretch. That said, we'd like to hear the work you mentioned. If it's not meant to be heard, the author not meant to be known and credited, then imo it's not a good source for the wiki. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) | : I think superpyth implies a mapping of 17 due to its whole tone fitting ~17/15 very well, but calling it ''diatonisma'' for that reason is indeed quite a stretch. That said, we'd like to hear the work you mentioned. If it's not meant to be heard, the author not meant to be known and credited, then imo it's not a good source for the wiki. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
: I asked them and they insist on anonymity. I guess we'll stick to ''diatonisma'' for now. --[[User:Frostburn|Frostburn]] ([[User talk:Frostburn|talk]]) 17:24, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |