|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == reduce edo list? ==
| |
| the list is very long. What criteria makes a given edo in or out? Could we reduce the list to the "best" representatives?
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' October 19, 2011, 03:00:40 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| If you aren't interested in an edo, don't read about it. But PLEASE let's not get into deletionism on this wiki.
| |
| | |
| In case it isn't clear, I vote NO>
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' October 19, 2011, 04:32:14 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| No fear - I'm a "militant" inclusionist :-)
| |
| | |
| I'm just adding links and I asked myself: are they ''all'' equally important in this article.
| |
| | |
| Can you give my an information on ''how'' you decided to include these - so that I can see what you see? Thx in advance!
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' October 19, 2011, 09:50:06 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| The edos pages I edited all had some feature or other which seemed worthy of note. Often they were selected because they provided the optimal patent val for some temperament; another reason was because they were very strong for their size.
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' October 22, 2011, 11:56:37 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |