Semicanousmic clan: Difference between revisions

+diagrams
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 24: Line 24:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.3342, ~18/11 = 854.5548
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.3342, ~18/11 = 854.5548


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 56, 73, 80, 87, 118, 205, 323, 528e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 56, 73, 80, 87, 118, 205, 323, 528e }}


[[Badness]]: 0.142 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.142 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 37: Line 37:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3427, ~18/11 = 854.5587
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.3427, ~18/11 = 854.5587


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 24, 31g, 55g, 56gg, 63, 70c, 80gg, 87, 111, 118, 205, 528e, 733e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24, 31g, 55g, 56gg, 63, 70c, 80gg, 87, 111, 118, 205, 528e, 733e }}


Badness: 0.481 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.481 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 50: Line 50:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2987, ~18/11 = 854.5520
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.2987, ~18/11 = 854.5520


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 24, 55gh, 63, 70c, 80gghh, 87, 94, 111, 118, 205, 323, 528e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24, 55gh, 63, 70c, 80gghh, 87, 94, 111, 118, 205, 323, 528e }}


Badness: 0.403 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.403 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 65: Line 65:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.0812, ~18/11 = 854.4115
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~3/2 = 702.0812, ~18/11 = 854.4115


{{Val list|legend=1| 7d, 17c, 24, 77c, 87d, 94, 111, 118, 212, 323, 441e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, 17c, 24, 77c, 87d, 94, 111, 118, 212, 323, 441e }}


[[Badness]]: 3.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 3.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 78: Line 78:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1682, ~18/11 = 854.5074
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1682, ~18/11 = 854.5074


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 94, 111, 205, 212, 323, 535ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 111, 205, 212, 323, 535ef }}


Badness: 3.01 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 3.01 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 91: Line 91:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1910, ~18/11 = 854.4751
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1910, ~18/11 = 854.4751


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 94, 111, 205, 212g, 323 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 111, 205, 212g, 323 }}


Badness: 1.69 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.69 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 104: Line 104:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1925, ~18/11 = 854.4721
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 702.1925, ~18/11 = 854.4721


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 94, 111, 205, 212gh, 323 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 94, 111, 205, 212gh, 323 }}


Badness: 1.27 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.27 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 121: Line 121:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~400/231 = 951.1975, ~200/189 = 96.5851
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~400/231 = 951.1975, ~200/189 = 96.5851


{{Val list|legend=1| 87, 111, 125, 198, 212, 323, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 111, 125, 198, 212, 323, 410 }}


[[Badness]]: 3.95 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 3.95 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 134: Line 134:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.2316, ~55/52 = 96.6155
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.2316, ~55/52 = 96.6155


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 87, 111, 198, 323, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 111, 198, 323, 410 }}


Badness: 1.89 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.89 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 147: Line 147:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.2022, ~55/52 = 96.6006
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.2022, ~55/52 = 96.6006


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 87, 111, 198g, 212g, 299, 323, 410 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 111, 198g, 212g, 299, 323, 410 }}


Badness: 1.90 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.90 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 160: Line 160:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.1749, ~55/52 = 96.5813
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~26/15 = 951.1749, ~55/52 = 96.5813


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 87, 111, 198gh, 212gh, 299, 323, 410, 622ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 111, 198gh, 212gh, 299, 323, 410, 622ef }}


Badness: 1.73 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.73 × 10<sup>-3</sup>