Talk:Arithmetic tuning: Difference between revisions

Line 3:

* ''Arithmetic tuning'' to ''arithmetic-like tuning'';

* ''AFS'' to ''EFS'' (''equal frequency sequence''), and alternatively as I much prefer, ''arithmetic sequence'', in which case ''arithmetic'' means equal frequency;

* ''APS'' to ''EPS'' (''equal pitch sequence''), and alternative as I much prefer, ''equal sequence'', in which case pitch is assumed;

* ''ALS'' to ''ELS'' (''equal length sequence''), and alternatively as I much prefer, ''inverse-arithmetic sequence'', in which case ''inverse-arithmetic'' means equal length.

Line 33:

Line 34:

:::: Yes, applying arithmetic sequences on the different scales of measurement is one possible logic. The approach I much prefer is to think of a kind of sequence as ''indicating'' the scale of measurement.

:::: I explained the lack of orthogonality as "one specification is often encompassed by another", and so by having orthogonality our specifications would be minimal and disjoint from each other. Note that this is not abouting deprecating the concepts and the names, only how we specify individual tuning systems. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

:::: I explained the lack of orthogonality as "one specification is often encompassed by another", and so by having orthogonality our specifications would be minimal and disjoint from each other. Note that this is not abouting deprecating the concepts and the names, only how we specify individual tuning systems.

:::: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 * ''Arithmetic tuning'' to ''arithmetic-like tuning'';
 * ''AFS'' to ''EFS'' (''equal frequency sequence''), and alternatively as I much prefer, ''arithmetic sequence'', in which case ''arithmetic'' means equal frequency;
+* ''APS'' to ''EPS'' (''equal pitch sequence''), and alternative as I much prefer, ''equal sequence'', in which case pitch is assumed;
 * ''ALS'' to ''ELS'' (''equal length sequence''), and alternatively as I much prefer, ''inverse-arithmetic sequence'', in which case ''inverse-arithmetic'' means equal length.
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 :::: Yes, applying arithmetic sequences on the different scales of measurement is one possible logic. The approach I much prefer is to think of a kind of sequence as ''indicating'' the scale of measurement.
-:::: I explained the lack of orthogonality as "one specification is often encompassed by another", and so by having orthogonality our specifications would be minimal and disjoint from each other. Note that this is not abouting deprecating the concepts and the names, only how we specify individual tuning systems. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
+:::: I explained the lack of orthogonality as "one specification is often encompassed by another", and so by having orthogonality our specifications would be minimal and disjoint from each other. Note that this is not abouting deprecating the concepts and the names, only how we specify individual tuning systems.
+:::: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 19:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)