Talk:Relative interval error

Revision as of 06:44, 11 December 2020 by TallKite (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Unclear == Now that this article is linked to from the edo template, it will get a lot of views from newbies. But it's not written very clearly. "Closest mapping" sounds li...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Unclear

Now that this article is linked to from the edo template, it will get a lot of views from newbies. But it's not written very clearly. "Closest mapping" sounds like it refers to the patent val aka nearest edomapping. I changed this to "direct mapping".

I rewrote the article to make it clearer, but the "Additivity" section needs more work.

"a ratio which is the product of some other ratios have their relative errors additive" -- this is often not true for a direct mapping. And yet the article doesn't make this clear.

I also question "an edo which is the sum of some other edos have their relative errors additive". 13-edo and 18-edo both sharpen 3/2 a lot, but 31-edo flattens it slightly. --TallKite (talk) 06:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Return to "Relative interval error" page.