User talk:Eufalesio/Moture's Extended Functional Just System

th for your contribution! you can check out the content with more details in my original page. you came up with a NFJS-ish formal commas first, that's great, and remember there are more options.-FilterNashi (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

About Formal commas and RoT

in the EFJS, the height (complexity) of the intervals does not only depends on the fifth. and there's 1/3 fifth, 1/4 fifth and 1/2 octave, 1/3 octave as well. So that's much harder to determine RoT or something like that. so the formal commas can be determined with these:

  1. experience / intuition. not for a very specific reason.
  2. based on the much more complicated ways to measure the complexity of the intervals. -

FilterNashi (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

I assumed that since you said that the formal comma for 11 should be sqrt(243/242), I thought that this system was to be integrated with Neutral FJS. What other alternatives are there?
--Eufalesio (talk) 13:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

About i degrees

i like the idea of i degrees for irrational intervals. but that would break the consistency if the degrees can be any real number. like the example which already exists in the page, 5\13{3} can be represent without i degrees.-FilterNashi (talk) 09:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Eufalesio/Moture's Extended Functional Just System".