Talk:Collection of EDO impressions

Thanks

@Flora thanks a lot for finally cleaning up this growing usability nightmare :) --Xenwolf (talk) 18:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove non-impressions?

I find the UHs and LOLs neither helpful nor funny. I'd therefore suggest to remove these anti-statements. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, in a way, I get the sense that "Uh" means "I don't know enough about this EDO to say anything much", while "LOL" means something like "The idea that anyone would even consider taking this EDO seriously is absurd". I don't know what else to say about those. --Aura (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Let's be honest. I think who is not able to really tell something about an EDO should better skip it. I'm pretty sure all this non-info dates back to the table decision. And that was a really bad one: Over time, the table has grown in both dimensions (rows=EDOs and columns=Users), becoming full of holes and nops. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. --Aura (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Sections

I would suggest creating a separate section for each EDO mentioned. This way it is easier to correct typos directly or just add single impression to a single EDO. It may also resolve editing conflicts (the MediaWiki software has some ability to handle concurrency). --Xenwolf (talk) 13:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)