Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
MV3 proofs: more commonly used term now
Line 29: Line 29:


For theorems relating to the AG property, see [[AG]].
For theorems relating to the AG property, see [[AG]].
==== Definitions: LQ ====
==== Definitions: Billiard scale ====
Let n = a_1 + ... + a_r be the scale size, w a scale word with signature a_1 X_1, ..., a_r X_r, let L be a line of the form L(t) = (a_1, ..., a_r)t + v_0, where v_0 is a constant vector in R^r. We say that L is ''in generic position'' if L contains a point (0, α_1, α_2, ... α_{r-1}) where α_i and α_i/α_j for i != j are irrational.
Let n = a_1 + ... + a_r be the scale size, w a scale word with signature a_1 X_1, ..., a_r X_r, let L be a line of the form L(t) = (a_1, ..., a_r)t + v_0, where v_0 is a constant vector in R^r. We say that L is ''in generic position'' if L contains a point (0, α_1, α_2, ... α_{r-1}) where α_i and α_i/α_j for i != j are irrational.


* Assume ''S'' is a 2-step scale. Then ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a.
Say that an r-step scale ''S'' is a ''billiard scale'' if any appropriate line in generic position, (a_1, ..., a_r)t + v_0, has intersections with coordinate level planes x_i = k that spell out the scale as you move in the positive t direction.
* Say that a 2-step scale ''S'' is ''floor-LQ'' if some mode ''M'' of ''S'' satisfies that γ(''M'') = the graph of floor(b/a*x).
* Say that an r-step scale ''S'' is ''LQ'' if any appropriate line in generic position, (a_1, ..., a_r)t + v_0, has intersections with coordinate level planes x_i = k that spell out the scale as you move in the positive t direction.
<!--===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales (WIP) =====
<!--===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales (WIP) =====
Assume wlog there are more L's than s's.
Assume wlog there are more L's than s's.