Talk:Very low accuracy temperaments: Difference between revisions
m 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Imagine playing a 7–limit song in one of these temperaments [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 16:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC) | Imagine playing a 7–limit song in one of these temperaments [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 16:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
== Need help naming the 11/10 extension of antitonic and calculating its xenwiki badness == | |||
First, the badness shown on x31eq is ''parametric'' badness. It is a badness measure that allows you to control your preferred tradeoff between complexity and accuracy. I have no idea how to calculate the badness that this wiki wants to see on temperament pages. | |||
Second, based on x31eq, I have proposed an 11-limit extension of antitonic that tempers out 11/10 instead of 12/11. This only introduces 0.3 cents of additional error over 12/11, and beats it quite handily in parametric badness. I have given it the name Antietam, but maybe the community can come up with a better name. [[User:Bootmii|Bootmii]] ([[User talk:Bootmii|talk]]) 02:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC) | |||