Talk:Trivial temperament: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::Exactly, the "syllable encompassing the entire universe" thing is spot on. I just called it Om temperament because there's only one temperament-distinct pitch in the whole system, kind of like "Om" is the only word you need to create the whole universe. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 22:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | :::Exactly, the "syllable encompassing the entire universe" thing is spot on. I just called it Om temperament because there's only one temperament-distinct pitch in the whole system, kind of like "Om" is the only word you need to create the whole universe. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 22:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::: Yourmusic: Thanks for the advice. As you can see, I've alerted Keenan to this discussion. | |||
:::: Keenan: Thanks for explaining. Okay, word, well, I can get down with nondualism. It's sort of sad that it ended up on a page with "trivial" in the name, but I suppose that's part of it, huh, accepting the triviality of it all. Or maybe now I'm just conflating things with existentialism... :-P | |||
:::: Anyone: So, I think that's enough information to explain things on the page. But my question about the capitalization still stands. Shouldn't it be "Om" everywhere, not "OM"? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 23:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||