Talk:Meet and join: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:::: I am not in favor of introducing new symbols, especially since & has been in wide use specifically to denote the operation "join" on temperaments. | :::: I am not in favor of introducing new symbols, especially since & has been in wide use specifically to denote the operation "join" on temperaments. | ||
:::: - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | :::: - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
::::: People have been talking about joining and meeting both vals and kernels for quite some time. The way you are proposing to use & for kernels would conflict with the more general usage of &, where it denotes the join of either vals or monzos. The symbols I chose weren't really an attempt to introduce something new, just a response to Douglas's suggestion to replace the curvy cup/wedge symbols with something easier to differentiate in text. I'd be willing to go with something like && and || though, if you'd like. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 00:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Suggestion to add a helpful image == | == Suggestion to add a helpful image == | ||