Talk:Meet and join: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
: So, if you intentionally chose not to use the symbols for & and | for meet and join on this page as I had suggested, then I won't press you on the matter further. Though I would at least like to know what your reasons were. And also, if that is the case, would you mind at least — for outwards compatibility — adding a note that & and | can be used as well? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | : So, if you intentionally chose not to use the symbols for & and | for meet and join on this page as I had suggested, then I won't press you on the matter further. Though I would at least like to know what your reasons were. And also, if that is the case, would you mind at least — for outwards compatibility — adding a note that & and | can be used as well? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: The way I have been using & for years is as a generic "join" operator, either to join vals, such as 12p & 19p, or also to join monzos, such as 2.3.5.7 81/80 & 64/63. If you are using & to join vals then it is a "meet" of the temperament kernels, and if you are using & to join kernels then you get a "meet" of vals. It seems like your proposal wouldn't be compatible with this existing usage so I used another symbol. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 22:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Suggestion to add a helpful image == | == Suggestion to add a helpful image == | ||