Taxonomies of xen approaches: Difference between revisions
Created page with "== Inthar's taxonomy == One possible taxonomy of approaches to xen: JI-based approaches either use JI directly, or interpret all pitches in a system as JI ratios. JI-agnostic..." Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Stacking-based approaches obtain all pitches by stacking a finite set of intervals. Non-stacking based approaches do not think of pitches in systems this way, even if e.g. [[edo]]s are trivially stacking-based. | Stacking-based approaches obtain all pitches by stacking a finite set of intervals. Non-stacking based approaches do not think of pitches in systems this way, even if e.g. [[edo]]s are trivially stacking-based. | ||
* JI-based, stacking-based: Traditional, JI-based [[RTT]] is a major approach that belongs to this, in JI-based RTT ''interpretations'' of two intervals stack according to the temperament map. So is prime-limited or lattice-based JI. | * JI-based, stacking-based: Traditional, JI-based [[RTT]] is a major approach that belongs to this, in JI-based RTT the JI ''interpretations'' of two intervals stack according to the temperament map. So is prime-limited or lattice-based JI. | ||
* JI-based, non-stacking-based: [[Primodality]] and [[neji]]s. | * JI-based, non-stacking-based: [[Primodality]] and [[neji]]s. | ||
* JI-agnostic, stacking-based: Uninterpreted [[mos]]ses and k-step scales. | * JI-agnostic, stacking-based: Uninterpreted [[mos]]ses and k-step scales. | ||
* JI-agnostic, non-stacking-based: This is a more wide-open area. | * JI-agnostic, non-stacking-based: This is a more wide-open area. | ||