17ed5: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[[Ed5|Division of the 5th harmonic]] into 17 equal parts''' (17ED5) is a good [[hyperpyth]] tuning. The step size is about 163.9008 cents, corresponding to 7.3215 [[EDO]]. | '''[[Ed5|Division of the 5th harmonic]] into 17 equal parts''' (17ED5) is a good [[hyperpyth]] tuning. The step size is about 163.9008 cents, corresponding to 7.3215 [[EDO]]. | ||
A hyperpyth tuning, 17ED5 offers a good compromise between 13/5 and 17/5, but the 9/5 of 983 cents is a little bit flat. However, in hyperpyth, 21/5 isn't necessarily represented, at least not as well. In 17ED5, the 21/5 is represented about as well as the 9/5 is, although that's not too good. Luckily, 27, 29, and 39 do a fair job of it. Nevertheless it's the simplest equal hyperpyth after | == Division of the 5/1 into 17 tones == | ||
A hyperpyth tuning, 17ED5 offers a good compromise between 13/5 and 17/5, but the 9/5 of 983 cents is a little bit flat. However, in hyperpyth, 21/5 isn't necessarily represented, at least not as well. In 17ED5, the 21/5 is represented about as well as the 9/5 is, although that's not too good. Luckily, 27, 29, and 39 do a fair job of it. Nevertheless it's the simplest equal hyperpyth after 5ED5, and quite consonant. I imagine it to be the traditional tonality of the tiny creatures living on subatomic particles. | |||
But wait, an interesting pattern emerges: | But wait, an interesting pattern emerges: | ||
22ED5 focuses on 9/5 | [[22ed5|22ED5]] focuses on 9/5 | ||
27ED5 focuses on 13/5 | [[27ed5|27ED5]] focuses on 13/5 | ||
29ED5 focuses on 17/5 | [[29ed5|29ED5]] focuses on 17/5 | ||
(and 34=17*2) | (and 34=17*2) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
so: 22+27+29=78=39*2 | so: 22+27+29=78=39*2 | ||
and behold, of the lot, 39ED5 offers the best balance between those intervals. | and behold, of the lot, [[39ed5|39ED5]] offers the best balance between those intervals. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||