Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
This in particular implies that xyzyx is not LQ. | This in particular implies that xyzyx is not LQ. | ||
====== MV3 + EMOS implies PMOS (WIP) ====== | ====== MV3 + EMOS implies PMOS (WIP) ====== | ||
Suppose w_{YZ} is a word made by identifying Y and Z into one letter, say Q. | |||
Suppose w_{YZ} has a k-step, k > 1, which comes in three sizes | |||
* v_1 = A_1 X + B_1 Q, | |||
* v_2 = A_2 X + B_2 Q, | |||
* v_3 = A_3 X + B_3 Q. | |||
If some A_i and A_j differed by more than 2, a contradiction would result, as all intermediate combinations must be attained (since scooting over by one step changes the numbers of Q's and X's by <= 1). So we assume | |||
* v_1 = AX + BQ, | |||
* v_2 = (A-1)X + (B+1)Q, | |||
* v_3 = (A+1)X + (B-1)Q. | |||
Eliminating X from w, we have that w_X is a mos, by the EMOS assumption. At least one of B, B-1, B+1 is not a period multiple of w_X, say B_0, hence a B_0-step of w_X comes in two sizes. For a contradiction we seek two intervals in w: | |||
# u_L + A_0 X, and | |||
# u_s + A_0 X, | |||
where u_L and u_s are the larger and smaller B_0-steps of w_X. | |||
Some B_0-step, say u_L, occurs at least K = ceil(n(w_X)/2) = ceil((b+c)/2) times. If K = 1, then b = c = 1, this case should be relatively easy to deal with... | |||
If K >= 2, then ... | |||
Chunks of consecutive X's, separated by at most 2 non-X letters, can come in sizes that differ by at most 2 (including 0), by MV3. | |||
====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) (WIP) ====== | ====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) (WIP) ====== |