Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions
→Definitions: LQ (WIP): Defining LQ is a wip for 3-step scales Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* Assume ''S'' is a 2-step scale. Then ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a. | * Assume ''S'' is a 2-step scale. Then ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a. | ||
* Say that a 2-step scale ''S'' is ''floor-LQ'' if some mode of ''S'' gives the graph of floor(b/a*x). | * Say that a 2-step scale ''S'' is ''floor-LQ'' if some mode of ''S'' gives the graph of floor(b/a*x). | ||
* Say that a k-step scale ''S'' is ''LQ'' if | |||
===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales ===== | ===== MV2 is equivalent to floor-LQ in 2-step scales ===== | ||
Assume wlog there are more L's than s's. | Assume wlog there are more L's than s's. | ||