Rank-3 scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 25: Line 25:
Let n = a+b+c be the scale size, w = aX bY cZ be the scale word, let R be the corresponding path following the word w (R(k) = your location after taking k steps according to w), and put n+1 equally spaced points p_n on the line segment L = {(a,b,c)t : 0 <= t <= n}, i.e. the points {L(k) = (a,b,c) k : k ∈ {0, ..., n}}. Say ''S'' is ''pointwise-least-squares-LQ'' if the sum of (R(k) - L(k))^2 over k ∈ {0, ..., n} is minimized; say ''S'' is ''pointwise-minimax-LQ'' if the max distance max{|R(k)-L(k)| : k} is minimized. Say that a [[mos]] (MV2) scale ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a.
Let n = a+b+c be the scale size, w = aX bY cZ be the scale word, let R be the corresponding path following the word w (R(k) = your location after taking k steps according to w), and put n+1 equally spaced points p_n on the line segment L = {(a,b,c)t : 0 <= t <= n}, i.e. the points {L(k) = (a,b,c) k : k ∈ {0, ..., n}}. Say ''S'' is ''pointwise-least-squares-LQ'' if the sum of (R(k) - L(k))^2 over k ∈ {0, ..., n} is minimized; say ''S'' is ''pointwise-minimax-LQ'' if the max distance max{|R(k)-L(k)| : k} is minimized. Say that a [[mos]] (MV2) scale ''S'' is ''slope-LQ'' if the slope between any two pair of points (representing a ''k''-mosstep) is one of the two nearest possible slopes (in the set {k/0,...,0/k}) to b/a.


==== Lemma 0: Mosses are LQ ====
==== Lemma 0: Mosses are LQ (WIP) ====
Every mos is slope-LQ. This follows from the fact that every k-step is of the form pL qs or (p+1)L (q-1)s, where p/q <= a/b <= (p+1)/(q-1). This in turn follows from the fact that a mos has a generator, since every k-step is an octave reduction of either k perfect generators or k-1 perfect generators + 1 imperfect generator, and the perfect generator and the imperfect generator differ by changing one L to an s. If both the perfect generator and the imperfect generator had #L/#s > b/a (it must definitely be smaller than ceil(b/a) + 1, since the perfect generator is a collection of L...Ls chunks, and the size of such a chunk is <= ceil(b/a)), this would imply that n-1 perfect generators + 1 imperfect generator would not close at a period multiple.
Every mos is slope-LQ. This follows from the fact that every k-step is of the form pL qs or (p+1)L (q-1)s, where p/q <= a/b <= (p+1)/(q-1). This in turn follows from the fact that a mos has a generator, since every k-step is an octave reduction of either k perfect generators or k-1 perfect generators + 1 imperfect generator, and the perfect generator and the imperfect generator differ by changing one L to an s. If both the perfect generator and the imperfect generator had #L/#s > b/a (it must definitely be smaller than ceil(b/a) + 1, since the perfect generator is a collection of L...Ls chunks, and the size of such a chunk is <= ceil(b/a)), this would imply that n-1 perfect generators + 1 imperfect generator would not close at a period multiple.


There should be some Calc 1 stuff that I can do to show that mosses are pointwise-LQ.
There should be some Calc 1 stuff that I can do to show that mosses are pointwise-LQ.


==== MV3 Theorem 1 ====
==== MV3 Theorem 1 (WIP) ====
''The following are equivalent for a non-multiperiod scale word S with steps x, y, z:''
''The following are equivalent for a non-multiperiod scale word S with steps x, y, z:''
# ''S is MV3.''
# ''S is MV3.''
Line 36: Line 36:
# ''S is AG, or S is of the form x'y'z'y'x' or its repetitions, or x'y'x'z'x'y'x' or its repetitions.''
# ''S is AG, or S is of the form x'y'z'y'x' or its repetitions, or x'y'x'z'x'y'x' or its repetitions.''


====== Lemma 1: S is pairwise MOS (PMOS) except in the case "xyzyx" ======
====== Lemma 1: S is pairwise MOS (PMOS) except in the case "xyzyx" (WIP) ======
TODO: account for case xyzyx.
TODO: account for case xyzyx.


Line 72: Line 72:
''To be continued...''
''To be continued...''


====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) ======
====== PMOS implies AG (except in the case xyxzxyx) (WIP) ======
We now prove that except in the case xyxzxyx, if the scale is pairwise MOS, then it is AG.
We now prove that except in the case xyxzxyx, if the scale is pairwise MOS, then it is AG.