TAMNAMS: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Inthar (talk | contribs)
m capitalization consistency with Diamond-mos notation
Line 1: Line 1:
'''TAMNAMS''' (read "tame names"; from '''''T'''emperament-'''A'''gnostic '''M'''OS '''NAM'''ing '''S'''ystem''), devised by the XA Discord, is a system of temperament-agnostic names for octave-[[MOS]] scales and their associated generator ranges, taking into account the relative sizes of large and small steps.
'''TAMNAMS''' (read "tame names"; from '''''T'''emperament-'''A'''gnostic '''M'''os '''NAM'''ing '''S'''ystem''), devised by the XA Discord, is a system of temperament-agnostic names for octave-[[mos]] scales and their associated generator ranges, taking into account the relative sizes of large and small steps.


== Step ratio spectrum ==
== Step ratio spectrum ==
=== Simple step ratios ===
=== Simple step ratios ===
The TAMNAMS system names nine specific simple [[Blackwood's R|L:s ratios]]. These correspond to the simplest edos that have the MOS scale.
The TAMNAMS system names nine specific simple [[Blackwood's R|L:s ratios]]. These correspond to the simplest edos that have the mos scale.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Step ratio names
|+Step ratio names
Line 46: Line 46:
|5edo
|5edo
|}
|}
For example, the 5L2s (diatonic) scale of 19edo has a step ratio of 3:2, which is "soft". We call the 19edo diatonic scale "soft diatonic". Tunings of a MOS with L:s larger are "harder", and tunings with L:s smaller are "softer".
For example, the 5L2s (diatonic) scale of 19edo has a step ratio of 3:2, which is "soft". We call the 19edo diatonic scale "soft diatonic". Tunings of a mos with L:s larger are "harder", and tunings with L:s smaller are "softer".


The two extremes, equalized and paucitonic, are degenerate cases. An equalized MOS has L equal to s, so the MOS pattern is no longer apparent. A paucitonic MOS has s = 0, merging adjacent tones s apart into a single tone. In both cases, the MOS structure is no longer valid.
The two extremes, equalized and paucitonic, are degenerate cases. An equalized mos has L equal to s, so the mos pattern is no longer apparent. A paucitonic mos has s = 0, merging adjacent tones s apart into a single tone. In both cases, the mos structure is no longer valid.


=== Step ratio ranges ===
=== Step ratio ranges ===
In between the nine specific ratios there are eight ranges of ratios. Each range has a name. These names are useful for classifying MOS tunings which don't match any of the nine simple step ratios. ''Hypohard'' could be used for tunings that are harder than basic but not as hard as the 3:1 tuning; similarly, ''hyposoft'' can be used for the range between soft and basic. Note that the soft-of-basic range is always strictly proper while the hard-of-basic range is often improper but is always proper in the case that there is 1 small step per period in the MOS pattern.
In between the nine specific ratios there are eight ranges of ratios. Each range has a name. These names are useful for classifying mos tunings which don't match any of the nine simple step ratios. ''Hypohard'' could be used for tunings that are harder than basic but not as hard as the 3:1 tuning; similarly, ''hyposoft'' can be used for the range between soft and basic. Note that the soft-of-basic range is always strictly proper while the hard-of-basic range is often improper but is always proper in the case that there is 1 small step per period in the mos pattern.


By default, all ranges include their endpoints. For example, a hard tuning is considered a quasihard tuning. To exclude endpoints, the modifier "strict" can be used, for example "strict hyposoft".
By default, all ranges include their endpoints. For example, a hard tuning is considered a quasihard tuning. To exclude endpoints, the modifier "strict" can be used, for example "strict hyposoft".
Line 133: Line 133:
'''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)
'''Paucitonic''': L/s = 1/0 = infinity (trivial/pathological)


== Naming MOS intervals ==
== Naming mos intervals ==
To denote interval classes within the MOS, TAMNAMS uses the generic prefix ''mos-'', or the specific prefixes and abbreviations listed under "MOS pattern names". Usage example: ''In 31edo's ultrasoft [[mosh]] scale, the perfect mosthird (aka Pmosh3rd) is a neutral third and the major mosfifth (aka Lmosh5th) is a perfect fifth.''  
To denote interval classes within the mos, TAMNAMS uses the generic prefix ''mos-'', or the specific prefixes and abbreviations listed under "mos pattern names". Usage example: ''In 31edo's ultrasoft [[mosh]] scale, the perfect mosthird (aka Pmosh3rd) is a neutral third and the major mosfifth (aka Lmosh5th) is a perfect fifth.''  


The way intervals are named above (and in 12edo theory) has a problem. An interval that's n steps wide is named "(n+1)th". This means that adding two intervals is more complicated than it should be. Stacking two fifths makes a ninth, when naively it would make a tenth. We're used to this for the diatonic scale, but when dealing with unfamiliar scale structures, it can be very confusing. Thus we propose a variant name system: First, use the term "mosstep" for steps of the mos, large or small. From there, an interval which is k mossteps wide is a "k-mosstep", short for "k-mosstep interval". Major, minor, perfect, etc would apply as established. The names "mosoctave" (or "mosequave" for nonoctave mosses) and "mosunison" could still be used, interchangeably with "n-mosstep" (for an n-tone mos) and "0-mosstep" respectively. This change makes the arithmetic needed to understand mos intervals much smoother.
The way intervals are named above (and in 12edo theory) has a problem. An interval that's n steps wide is named "(n+1)th". This means that adding two intervals is more complicated than it should be. Stacking two fifths makes a ninth, when naively it would make a tenth. We're used to this for the diatonic scale, but when dealing with unfamiliar scale structures, it can be very confusing. Thus we propose a variant name system: First, use the term "mosstep" for steps of the mos, large or small. From there, an interval which is k mossteps wide is a "k-mosstep", short for "k-mosstep interval". Major, minor, perfect, etc would apply as established. The names "mosoctave" (or "mosequave" for nonoctave mosses) and "mosunison" could still be used, interchangeably with "n-mosstep" (for an n-tone mos) and "0-mosstep" respectively. This change makes the arithmetic needed to understand mos intervals much smoother.
Line 219: Line 219:
|}
|}


TAMNAMS uses the following modifiers to denote different interval sizes within a MOS interval class:
TAMNAMS uses the following modifiers to denote different interval sizes within a mos interval class:
* For multiples of the period plus or minus 0 or 1 generators: ''perfect''. (Diatonic examples: perfect mos4th (Pmos4th), perfect mos5th (Pmos5th), perfect mos8th (Pmos8th), perfect mos12th (Pmos12th), etc.)
* For multiples of the period plus or minus 0 or 1 generators: ''perfect''. (Diatonic examples: perfect mos4th (Pmos4th), perfect mos5th (Pmos5th), perfect mos8th (Pmos8th), perfect mos12th (Pmos12th), etc.)
* For generic interval classes with 2 specific sizes of intervals therein (which are therefore separated by a chroma of c = L - s), ''major'' and ''minor'' are used to distinguish the larger (L) and smaller (s) intervals. Note that the generator, its period-equivalents, and the generator's period-complement and its period-equivalents are the only intervals excluded from this rule due to their inclusion in the previous rule. Diatonic examples: major mos2nd (abbreviated Lmos2nd), minor mos3rd (abbreviated smos3rd), major mos3rd (Lmos3rd), etc.)
* For generic interval classes with 2 specific sizes of intervals therein (which are therefore separated by a chroma of c = L - s), ''major'' and ''minor'' are used to distinguish the larger (L) and smaller (s) intervals. Note that the generator, its period-equivalents, and the generator's period-complement and its period-equivalents are the only intervals excluded from this rule due to their inclusion in the previous rule. Diatonic examples: major mos2nd (abbreviated Lmos2nd), minor mos3rd (abbreviated smos3rd), major mos3rd (Lmos3rd), etc.)
Line 228: Line 228:
* The pattern continues, ddd for triply diminished and AAA for triply augmented. Note that applying this operation more than 3 times is an unlikely usecase, and a shorthand notaton of d^3 and A^3 or an alternative notation or terminology entirely would likely be preferable in such circumstances, hence repetition of the corresponding letter is a sufficient system.
* The pattern continues, ddd for triply diminished and AAA for triply augmented. Note that applying this operation more than 3 times is an unlikely usecase, and a shorthand notaton of d^3 and A^3 or an alternative notation or terminology entirely would likely be preferable in such circumstances, hence repetition of the corresponding letter is a sufficient system.


== MOS pattern names ==
== mos pattern names ==
The following names are suggested for certain octave-period MOSes of sizes between 6 and 10. These names are optional; interval size names and step ratio names can be combined with conventional "xL ys" names. For example: ''21edo is the soft [[5L 3s]] tuning and its major mosthird is a neutral third of size 342.9 cents.'' (Pattern names are the least important part of TAMNAMS.)
The following names are suggested for certain octave-period mosses of sizes between 6 and 10. These names are optional; interval size names and step ratio names can be combined with conventional "xL ys" names. For example: ''21edo is the soft [[5L 3s]] tuning and its major mosthird is a neutral third of size 342.9 cents.'' (Pattern names are the least important part of TAMNAMS.)


Some of these come from temperament-agnostic MOS names coined by [[Igliashon Jones]] and others, as well as some of the names (such as "mosh") from [[Graham Breed]]'s [[MOS naming#Graham_Breed.27s_naming_scheme|MOS names]]. Some are named by taking an arbitrary temperament that generates the scale (preferably in the MOS's [[proper]] range) and suffixing ''-oid''. These names have been coined so that MOSes can be discussed more independently of RTT temperaments (while drawing on an established RTT tradition in the xen community which may help make the names more meaningful to more people).
Some of these come from temperament-agnostic mos names coined by [[Igliashon Jones]] and others, as well as some of the names (such as "mosh") from [[Graham Breed]]'s [[mos naming#Graham_Breed.27s_naming_scheme|mos names]]. Some are named by taking an arbitrary temperament that generates the scale (preferably in the mos's [[proper]] range) and suffixing ''-oid''. These names have been coined so that mosses can be discussed more independently of RTT temperaments (while drawing on an established RTT tradition in the xen community which may help make the names more meaningful to more people).


1L ns names are not given because the generator can be anywhere from the octave to to 1\(n+1) and can better be viewed as subsets of larger MOSes, for example [[1L 6s]] as a subset of [[7L 1s]].
1L ns names are not given because the generator can be anywhere from the octave to to 1\(n+1) and can better be viewed as subsets of larger mosses, for example [[1L 6s]] as a subset of [[7L 1s]].


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"
|+ TAMNAMS MOS names
|+ TAMNAMS mos names
|-
|-
!colspan=5| 6-note MOSes
!colspan=5| 6-note mosses
|-
|-
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix">used in interval names, e.g. "perfect oneirofourth"</ref> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr">used in abbreviations of interval names, e.g. "Po4"</ref> !! Notes
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix">used in interval names, e.g. "perfect oneirofourth"</ref> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr">used in abbreviations of interval names, e.g. "Po4"</ref> !! Notes
Line 244: Line 244:
| [[5L 1s]] || machinoid || mech- || mech || Named after the 2.9.7.11 5&6 temperament [[machine]].
| [[5L 1s]] || machinoid || mech- || mech || Named after the 2.9.7.11 5&6 temperament [[machine]].
|-
|-
!colspan=5| 7-note MOSes
!colspan=5| 7-note mosses
|-
|-
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix">used in interval names, e.g. "perfect oneirofourth"</ref> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr">used in abbreviations of interval names, e.g. "Po4"</ref> !! Notes
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix">used in interval names, e.g. "perfect oneirofourth"</ref> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr">used in abbreviations of interval names, e.g. "Po4"</ref> !! Notes
Line 258: Line 258:
| [[6L 1s]] || archeotonic || archeo- || arch || A name originally given to 13edo's 6L 1s.
| [[6L 1s]] || archeotonic || archeo- || arch || A name originally given to 13edo's 6L 1s.
|-
|-
!colspan=5| 8-note MOSes
!colspan=5| 8-note mosses
|-
|-
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
Line 268: Line 268:
| [[7L 1s]] || pine || pine- || pine || Named after the 11-limit 7&8 temperament [[porcupine]].
| [[7L 1s]] || pine || pine- || pine || Named after the 11-limit 7&8 temperament [[porcupine]].
|-
|-
!colspan=5| 9-note MOSes
!colspan=5| 9-note mosses
|-
|-
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
Line 282: Line 282:
| [[8L 1s]] || subneutralic || blu- || blu || From "subneutral 2nd" generator. ''blu'' comes from [[bleu]] temperament.
| [[8L 1s]] || subneutralic || blu- || blu || From "subneutral 2nd" generator. ''blu'' comes from [[bleu]] temperament.
|-
|-
!colspan=5| 10-note MOSes
!colspan=5| 10-note mosses
|-
|-
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
! Pattern !! Name !! Interval prefix<ref name="prefix"/> !! Abbreviation<ref name="abbr"/> !! Notes
Line 322: Line 322:
This results in the "central spectrum" - an elegant system which names all exact L/s ratios in the 5-integer-limit excepting only 5/1 and 5/4 which are disincluded intentionally for a variety of reasons: to keep the maximum corresponding notes per period in an [[EPD|equal pitch division]] low, because it keeps the 'tree' of mediants complete to a certain number of layers, and because their disinclusion gives a roughly-equally-spaced set of ratios, with the regions between 4/3 and 1/1 and between 4/1 and 1/0 being the only exceptions - corresponding to extreme tunings. Note that filling in those extreme regions is the purpose of the extended spectrum.
This results in the "central spectrum" - an elegant system which names all exact L/s ratios in the 5-integer-limit excepting only 5/1 and 5/4 which are disincluded intentionally for a variety of reasons: to keep the maximum corresponding notes per period in an [[EPD|equal pitch division]] low, because it keeps the 'tree' of mediants complete to a certain number of layers, and because their disinclusion gives a roughly-equally-spaced set of ratios, with the regions between 4/3 and 1/1 and between 4/1 and 1/0 being the only exceptions - corresponding to extreme tunings. Note that filling in those extreme regions is the purpose of the extended spectrum.
=== Extending the spectrum's edges ===
=== Extending the spectrum's edges ===
Extending the spectrum builds on the central spectrum and relies on a few key observations. Firstly, as periods and MOSSes come in wildly different shapes and sizes, and as we want to represent a somewhat representative variety of "simple" tunings for the step ratio for a given MOS pattern and period, the notion of "simple" used will correspond to the number of equally-spaced tones per period required. This is expressed as [number of large steps in pattern]*L + [number of small steps in pattern]*s, where L and s are from the step ratio itself, L/s, and are assumed to be coprime. Then, in order to not introduce bias to MOS patterns with more L's or more s's, we should assume that both are equally likely and thus weight both equally, which means that the resulting minimum number of tones per period for a ratio L/s is L+s. The next observation is that the large values of L/s can be a lot more consequential than the ones close to 1/1 due to the fact that small steps are guaranteed to be smaller than large steps and that we don't know how many small steps there are compared to large steps, and therefore the "hard" end of the spectrum is more vast, and analogously, L/s values close to 1/1 will tend to be inconsequential and for very close values likely impractical to distinguish - in the extremes only serving small tuning adjustments rather than melodic properties. This leads to another observation: MOS patterns with periods tuned to step ratios, while related to temperaments, ''are not'' temperaments - instead forming a sort of amalgamative superset of temperaments if you want to force a temperament interpretation, and thus their main function is in melodic structure, with temperaments informing potential harmonies and microtunings. Thus, the spectrum should be kept minimal and simple so that it is both generally hearable and not too specific.
Extending the spectrum builds on the central spectrum and relies on a few key observations. Firstly, as periods and mosses come in wildly different shapes and sizes, and as we want to represent a somewhat representative variety of "simple" tunings for the step ratio for a given mos pattern and period, the notion of "simple" used will correspond to the number of equally-spaced tones per period required. This is expressed as [number of large steps in pattern]*L + [number of small steps in pattern]*s, where L and s are from the step ratio itself, L/s, and are assumed to be coprime. Then, in order to not introduce bias to mos patterns with more L's or more s's, we should assume that both are equally likely and thus weight both equally, which means that the resulting minimum number of tones per period for a ratio L/s is L+s. The next observation is that the large values of L/s can be a lot more consequential than the ones close to 1/1 due to the fact that small steps are guaranteed to be smaller than large steps and that we don't know how many small steps there are compared to large steps, and therefore the "hard" end of the spectrum is more vast, and analogously, L/s values close to 1/1 will tend to be inconsequential and for very close values likely impractical to distinguish - in the extremes only serving small tuning adjustments rather than melodic properties. This leads to another observation: mos patterns with periods tuned to step ratios, while related to temperaments, ''are not'' temperaments - instead forming a sort of amalgamative superset of temperaments if you want to force a temperament interpretation, and thus their main function is in melodic structure, with temperaments informing potential harmonies and microtunings. Thus, the spectrum should be kept minimal and simple so that it is both generally hearable and not too specific.


The most obvious adjustment to the edges is to draw a distinction between "ultrasoft" and "pseudoequalized" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semiequalized", and between "ultrahard" and "pseudopaucitonic" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semipaucitonic". Thus:
The most obvious adjustment to the edges is to draw a distinction between "ultrasoft" and "pseudoequalized" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semiequalized", and between "ultrahard" and "pseudopaucitonic" by adding a step ratio corresponding to "semipaucitonic". Thus:
Line 374: Line 374:
A perhaps useful (or otherwise mildly amusing) mnemonic is "2-soft is too soft to be hard and 2-hard is too hard to be soft", representing that 2-soft = 2-hard = 2/1 = '''basic'''.
A perhaps useful (or otherwise mildly amusing) mnemonic is "2-soft is too soft to be hard and 2-hard is too hard to be soft", representing that 2-soft = 2-hard = 2/1 = '''basic'''.


Note that often the central spectrum will be sufficient for exploring a MOS pattern-period combination, and the extended spectrum is intended more for (literally) edge cases where it may be useful. Often if a temperament interpretation doesn't seem to show up for a MOS pattern-period combination, it just means the temperament needs a more complex MOS pattern to narrow down the generator range. An example of this phenomena is the highly complex MOS pattern of [[12L 17s]] represents near-Pythagorean tunings well due to having a generator of a fourth or a fifth bounded between those of [[12edo]] and those of [[29edo]], which are roughly equally off but in opposite directions, and many important near-Pythagorean systems show up in just the ratios of the central spectrum alone.
Note that often the central spectrum will be sufficient for exploring a mos pattern-period combination, and the extended spectrum is intended more for (literally) edge cases where it may be useful. Often if a temperament interpretation doesn't seem to show up for a mos pattern-period combination, it just means the temperament needs a more complex mos pattern to narrow down the generator range. An example of this phenomena is the highly complex mos pattern of [[12L 17s]] represents near-Pythagorean tunings well due to having a generator of a fourth or a fifth bounded between those of [[12edo]] and those of [[29edo]], which are roughly equally off but in opposite directions, and many important near-Pythagorean systems show up in just the ratios of the central spectrum alone.


[[Category:MOS]]
[[Category:mos]]