MOS scale: Difference between revisions
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Added direction to the TAMNAMS page, necessary since TAMNAMS is its own page now |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional Evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt. A great deal of interesting work has been done on scales in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the pentatonics used in traditional Japanese music, where the 5 tone cycles are derived from a 7 tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE. | With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional Evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt. A great deal of interesting work has been done on scales in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the pentatonics used in traditional Japanese music, where the 5 tone cycles are derived from a 7 tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE. | ||
As for using MOS scales in practice for making music, the period and equivalence interval are often taken to be the octave, but an additional parameter is required for defining a scale: the ''step ratio'', which is the ratio of the small step (usually denoted ''s'') to the large step (usually denoted ''L''). This is usually written as ''L''/''s'', however, using ''s''/''L'' has the advantage of avoiding division by zero in the trivial case where ''s'' = 0. Different step ratios can produce very varied sounding scales (and very varied corresponding potential temperament interpretations) for a given MOS pattern and period, so it's useful to consider a spectrum of simple step ratios for tunings. | As for using MOS scales in practice for making music, the period and equivalence interval are often taken to be the octave, but an additional parameter is required for defining a scale: the ''step ratio'', which is the ratio of the small step (usually denoted ''s'') to the large step (usually denoted ''L''). This is usually written as ''L''/''s'', however, using ''s''/''L'' has the advantage of avoiding division by zero in the trivial case where ''s'' = 0. Different step ratios can produce very varied sounding scales (and very varied corresponding potential temperament interpretations) for a given MOS pattern and period, so it's useful to consider a spectrum of simple step ratios for tunings. The [[TAMNAMS#Step ratio spectrum|TAMNAMS]] system has names for both specific ratios and ranges of ratios. | ||
== Naming == | == Naming == | ||