Talk:Tuning ranges of regular temperaments: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Def of nice range ==
== Def of nice range ==
I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." Actual math notation and formatting procedures as lists would help, if nothing else. [[User:IlL|Inthar]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." Actual math notation and formatting procedures as lists would help, if nothing else. [[User:IlL|Inthar]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
: Is "bump" acceptable here? :) Haha, if Inthar doesn't understand this either, then I am really concerned. Surely someone can explain? Maybe there's something on the old tuning lists... nope, I don't find anything. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 25 May 2021

Def of nice range

I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." Actual math notation and formatting procedures as lists would help, if nothing else. Inthar (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Is "bump" acceptable here? :) Haha, if Inthar doesn't understand this either, then I am really concerned. Surely someone can explain? Maybe there's something on the old tuning lists... nope, I don't find anything. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)