User talk:Inthar/MV3: Difference between revisions
lots of notes |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The contiguous run of Y'z and Z's, YZZY, does not have the interval 2Y in it, but if you consider the whole scale with the X removed, 2Y does appear. So the logical flaw is somewhere in the "scooting" part. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 18:34, 22 April 2021 (UTC) | The contiguous run of Y'z and Z's, YZZY, does not have the interval 2Y in it, but if you consider the whole scale with the X removed, 2Y does appear. So the logical flaw is somewhere in the "scooting" part. —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 18:34, 22 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Did we look at scales where you just eliminate one of the steps? I do remember looking at scales where you *equate* pairs of steps, which I think was what the Zabka paper was about. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 18:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Lots of Notes == | == Lots of Notes == | ||