Talk:MOS naming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m IlL moved page Talk:MOS Naming Scheme to Talk:MOS naming: shorter title, title case |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== "Perfect", "augmented" and "diminished" for generic MOS intervals == | |||
If small/large are supposed to be used instead of major/minor (which I agree with), are they also used for perfect intervals (i.e. the generator) and its augmented/diminished versions? Then what about augmented/diminished --- do they not have the same meaning as in diatonic, or do you have different terms for the chroma sharp and flat alterations in generic moses? I want TAMANMS to catch up with more established usage. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 13:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:24, 13 April 2021
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
"Perfect", "augmented" and "diminished" for generic MOS intervals
If small/large are supposed to be used instead of major/minor (which I agree with), are they also used for perfect intervals (i.e. the generator) and its augmented/diminished versions? Then what about augmented/diminished --- do they not have the same meaning as in diatonic, or do you have different terms for the chroma sharp and flat alterations in generic moses? I want TAMANMS to catch up with more established usage. Inthar (talk) 13:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)