Consistency: Difference between revisions
m →Consistency to distance d: explicitly mention the path |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ja = 一貫性 | | ja = 一貫性 | ||
}} | }} | ||
An [[edo]] represents the ''q''-[[odd-limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the ''q''-odd-limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. | An [[edo]] represents the ''q''-[[odd-limit]] '''consistently''' if the best approximations of the odd harmonics of the ''q''-odd-limit in that edo also give the best approximations of all the differences between these odd harmonics; for example, the difference between the best 7/4 and the best 5/4 is also the best 7/5. (Note: This does not necessarily refer to being consistent with a [[patent val]] of the edo.) | ||
While the term "consistency" is most frequently used to refer to some odd-limit, sometimes one may only care about 'some' of the intervals in some odd-limit; this situation often arises when working in JI [[Just_intonation_subgroup|subgroups]]. We can also "skip" certain intervals when evaluating consistency. For instance, [[12edo]] is consistent in the "no-11's, no 13's [[19-odd-limit]]", meaning for the set of the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19, where we deliberately skip 11 and 13. | While the term "consistency" is most frequently used to refer to some odd-limit, sometimes one may only care about 'some' of the intervals in some odd-limit; this situation often arises when working in JI [[Just_intonation_subgroup|subgroups]]. We can also "skip" certain intervals when evaluating consistency. For instance, [[12edo]] is consistent in the "no-11's, no 13's [[19-odd-limit]]", meaning for the set of the odd harmonics 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, 17, and 19, where we deliberately skip 11 and 13. |