User talk:Userminusone/Goldis comma: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:03, 19 March 2021 view source Userminusone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 217 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:50, 19 March 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::: I see what you're saying. I guess the negri comma, goldis comma, and porcupine comma could all be interpreted as similar but different 5 limit quarter tones. By the way, I just found out that [[89edo]] tempers out the quartisma and the goldis comma, which is a bizarre but cool bridge between your work and my work. --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 02:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)		::: I see what you're saying. I guess the negri comma, goldis comma, and porcupine comma could all be interpreted as similar but different 5 limit quarter tones. By the way, I just found out that [[89edo]] tempers out the quartisma and the goldis comma, which is a bizarre but cool bridge between your work and my work. --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 02:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::: For the record, three instances of 250/243 plus one instance of 129140163/125000000 also adds up to 9/8. Oh, and yeah, 89edo is definitely an interesting bridge between your work and mine. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)