User talk:Userminusone/Goldis comma: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:13, 19 March 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:03, 19 March 2021 view source Userminusone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 217 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:: I'm saying that even the negri comma needs to be reinterpreted as being something other than just a simple comma. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)		:: I'm saying that even the negri comma needs to be reinterpreted as being something other than just a simple comma. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 01:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

			::: I see what you're saying. I guess the negri comma, goldis comma, and porcupine comma could all be interpreted as similar but different 5 limit quarter tones. By the way, I just found out that [[89edo]] tempers out the quartisma and the goldis comma, which is a bizarre but cool bridge between your work and my work. --[[User:Userminusone\|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone\|talk]]) 02:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)