User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions

Line 92:

:::::::::::::::: Oh, and for the record, those kinds of mistakes happen to me a lot. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma ([[121/120]]) also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 5 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:24, 5 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 92:		Line 92:
	:::::::::::::::: Oh, and for the record, those kinds of mistakes happen to me a lot. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)		:::::::::::::::: Oh, and for the record, those kinds of mistakes happen to me a lot. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

	:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)		:::::::::::::: Hey, I'm curious, is the biyatisma ([[121/120]]) also a good candidate for a useful 11-limit comma? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 02:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)