User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions

Line 84:

::::::::::::: Ah cool, I'll check out the interval table! Ah yeah grossma probably a good candidate. I think maybe the next-tier extension to SHEFKHED could all [comma]-Wide, [comma]-narrow alterations, since I think names that suggest sizes of adjustment of interval may be exhausted after Super/sub, Up/under and bright/baby. Though interval 'types' only work when applied in a single direction - i.e. classic, undecimal, tridecimal, Barbados, and gentle (tempered), which might be cut because it assumes tempering out a comma, in which commas I need are 352/351, and 896/891, though 352/351 = U-T. It can be extended to other commas as in 'classic', where if applied in the 'other' direction it's 'comma-Wide' or 'comma-narrow', giving us 121/64 as the rastmic major seventh, but 243/128 the rastma-Wide major seventh. I'll look at some commas, and larger edos. Yeah indeed 270 might be a lot. I managed to jump from 72 to 270 straight away in my last interval naming system - sized based, Moric, based on the Moria, a single step of 72. I did tredekian, based on the tredek, a single size of 270 - but I guess that was much simpler to extend. --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 05:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: The only thing I think I can see about what you wrote that doesn't sound quite right to me at this point is what you said about 243/128, since 243/128 is a Pythagorean interval, and would thus just be assumed as the default major seventh. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:23, 3 February 2021 view source Lhearne (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 1,510 edits →Improvement on SHEFKHED interval names ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:26, 3 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 84:		Line 84:

	::::::::::::: Ah cool, I'll check out the interval table! Ah yeah grossma probably a good candidate. I think maybe the next-tier extension to SHEFKHED could all [comma]-Wide, [comma]-narrow alterations, since I think names that suggest sizes of adjustment of interval may be exhausted after Super/sub, Up/under and bright/baby. Though interval 'types' only work when applied in a single direction - i.e. classic, undecimal, tridecimal, Barbados, and gentle (tempered), which might be cut because it assumes tempering out a comma, in which commas I need are 352/351, and 896/891, though 352/351 = U-T. It can be extended to other commas as in 'classic', where if applied in the 'other' direction it's 'comma-Wide' or 'comma-narrow', giving us 121/64 as the rastmic major seventh, but 243/128 the rastma-Wide major seventh. I'll look at some commas, and larger edos. Yeah indeed 270 might be a lot. I managed to jump from 72 to 270 straight away in my last interval naming system - sized based, Moric, based on the Moria, a single step of 72. I did tredekian, based on the tredek, a single size of 270 - but I guess that was much simpler to extend. --[[User:Lhearne\|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne\|talk]]) 05:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)		::::::::::::: Ah cool, I'll check out the interval table! Ah yeah grossma probably a good candidate. I think maybe the next-tier extension to SHEFKHED could all [comma]-Wide, [comma]-narrow alterations, since I think names that suggest sizes of adjustment of interval may be exhausted after Super/sub, Up/under and bright/baby. Though interval 'types' only work when applied in a single direction - i.e. classic, undecimal, tridecimal, Barbados, and gentle (tempered), which might be cut because it assumes tempering out a comma, in which commas I need are 352/351, and 896/891, though 352/351 = U-T. It can be extended to other commas as in 'classic', where if applied in the 'other' direction it's 'comma-Wide' or 'comma-narrow', giving us 121/64 as the rastmic major seventh, but 243/128 the rastma-Wide major seventh. I'll look at some commas, and larger edos. Yeah indeed 270 might be a lot. I managed to jump from 72 to 270 straight away in my last interval naming system - sized based, Moric, based on the Moria, a single step of 72. I did tredekian, based on the tredek, a single size of 270 - but I guess that was much simpler to extend. --[[User:Lhearne\|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne\|talk]]) 05:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

			:::::::::::::: The only thing I think I can see about what you wrote that doesn't sound quite right to me at this point is what you said about 243/128, since 243/128 is a Pythagorean interval, and would thus just be assumed as the default major seventh. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)