User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions

Line 64:

::::: --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 01:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::: Believe it or not, I'm actually willing to work with you to try and improve ~~our respective systems~~ to where they're compatible, and I tend to think in some of the same terms when it comes to EDOs and the intervals that they approximate. I do actually like the idea of prefixing the 121/64 from 243/128, and since the rastma (243/242) does have an association as a chroma to me, I think we should have a conversation about this. For starters, I think the rastma makes perfect sense when you consider it as being almost exactly one third of a meantone comma, with a stack of three rastmas only falling short of the the meantone comma by a [[parimo]], so perhaps we can use the term "triensyntonic" (from "trien-" meaing "one third", and "syntonic") to describe those relationships by means of the rastma, and of course, there's also "R" for "rastmic". If there are other temperaments that relate the rastma to the meantone comma in different ways, then we have a rastmic-syntonic equivalence continuum in just the same way that we have a [[syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum]]. Does that make sense? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::: Believe it or not, I'm actually willing to work with you to try and improve my system and the SHEFKHED system to where they're compatible, and I tend to think in some of the same terms when it comes to EDOs and the intervals that they approximate. I do actually like the idea of prefixing the 121/64 from 243/128, and since the rastma (243/242) does have an association as a chroma to me, I think we should have a conversation about this. For starters, I think the rastma makes perfect sense when you consider it as being almost exactly one third of a meantone comma, with a stack of three rastmas only falling short of the the meantone comma by a [[parimo]], so perhaps we can use the term "triensyntonic" (from "trien-" meaing "one third", and "syntonic") to describe those relationships by means of the rastma, and of course, there's also "R" for "rastmic". If there are other temperaments that relate the rastma to the meantone comma in different ways, then we have a rastmic-syntonic equivalence continuum in just the same way that we have a [[syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum]]. Does that make sense? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:29, 3 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:32, 3 February 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 64:		Line 64:
	::::: --[[User:Lhearne\|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne\|talk]]) 01:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)		::::: --[[User:Lhearne\|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne\|talk]]) 01:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

	:::::: Believe it or not, I'm actually willing to work with you to try and improve ~~our respective systems~~ to where they're compatible, and I tend to think in some of the same terms when it comes to EDOs and the intervals that they approximate. I do actually like the idea of prefixing the 121/64 from 243/128, and since the rastma (243/242) does have an association as a chroma to me, I think we should have a conversation about this. For starters, I think the rastma makes perfect sense when you consider it as being almost exactly one third of a meantone comma, with a stack of three rastmas only falling short of the the meantone comma by a [[parimo]], so perhaps we can use the term "triensyntonic" (from "trien-" meaing "one third", and "syntonic") to describe those relationships by means of the rastma, and of course, there's also "R" for "rastmic". If there are other temperaments that relate the rastma to the meantone comma in different ways, then we have a rastmic-syntonic equivalence continuum in just the same way that we have a [[syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum]]. Does that make sense? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 03:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)		:::::: Believe it or not, I'm actually willing to work with you to try and improve my system and the SHEFKHED system to where they're compatible, and I tend to think in some of the same terms when it comes to EDOs and the intervals that they approximate. I do actually like the idea of prefixing the 121/64 from 243/128, and since the rastma (243/242) does have an association as a chroma to me, I think we should have a conversation about this. For starters, I think the rastma makes perfect sense when you consider it as being almost exactly one third of a meantone comma, with a stack of three rastmas only falling short of the the meantone comma by a [[parimo]], so perhaps we can use the term "triensyntonic" (from "trien-" meaing "one third", and "syntonic") to describe those relationships by means of the rastma, and of course, there's also "R" for "rastmic". If there are other temperaments that relate the rastma to the meantone comma in different ways, then we have a rastmic-syntonic equivalence continuum in just the same way that we have a [[syntonic-chromatic equivalence continuum]]. Does that make sense? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 03:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)