User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions

Line 55:

::: --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 15:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

:::: First off, I can tell you that I've already named 1771561/1769472 the [[Nexus comma]]. I can also say that I personally use the terms "Paramajor Fourth" and "Parminor Fifth" for [[11/8]] and [[16/11]] respectively, and that I also use the terms "Paraminor Fourth" and "Paramajor Fifth" for [[128/99]] and [[99/64]] respectively. Two 11/8 intervals add up to [[121/64]], which I classify as a certain type of major seventh, though we would need a prefix to distinguish this from the 243/128 major seventh. Similarly to the naming scheme involving whole tones and semitones, two instances of the [[33/32]] interval, which I call the "Parachromatic quartertone" or the "Parasuperprime", add up to [[1089/1024]], which I call the "parapotome", which, together with 128/121- the "Alpharabian limma" add up to the diatonic [[9/8]] whole tone. In terms of quartertones, the Alpharabian limma can be broken down into a single instance of 33/32 plus [[4096/3993]], which I . Truth be told, I'm familiar with both 24edo and 159edo, so I can envision it either way. Also, in all honesty, I'm curious as to what you think about my current naming scheme for [[Alpharabian tuning]], as the the 11-prime is really good for establishing quartertones, even if you also have to use the 3-prime to do it, and of course, I'm treating the terms "Paramajor" and "Paraminor" in much same way that "Major and "Minor" are treated in your system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

:::: First off, I can tell you that I've already named 1771561/1769472 the [[Nexus comma]]. I can also say that I personally use the terms "Paramajor Fourth" and "Parminor Fifth" for [[11/8]] and [[16/11]] respectively, and that I also use the terms "Paraminor Fourth" and "Paramajor Fifth" for [[128/99]] and [[99/64]] respectively. Two 11/8 intervals add up to [[121/64]], which I classify as a certain type of major seventh, though we would need a prefix to distinguish this from the 243/128 major seventh. Similarly to the naming scheme involving whole tones and semitones, two instances of the [[33/32]] interval, which I call the "Parachromatic quartertone" or the "Parasuperprime", add up to [[1089/1024]], which I call the "parapotome", which, together with 128/121- the "Alpharabian limma" add up to the diatonic [[9/8]] whole tone. In terms of quartertones, the Alpharabian limma can be broken down into a single instance of 33/32 plus [[4096/3993]], which I call the "Paradiatonic quartertone". Truth be told, I'm familiar with both 24edo and 159edo, so I can envision it either way. Also, in all honesty, I'm curious as to what you think about my current naming scheme for [[Alpharabian tuning]], as the the 11-prime is really good for establishing quartertones, even if you also have to use the 3-prime to do it, and of course, I'm treating the terms "Paramajor" and "Paraminor" in much same way that "Major and "Minor" are treated in your system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

:::: Oh, and yes, I should have said [[27/16]] rather than 32/27. My bad, I guess I was thinking about the chain of [[128/121]] diatonic semitones. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ::: --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 15:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
-:::: First off, I can tell you that I've already named 1771561/1769472 the [[Nexus comma]].  I can also say that I personally use the terms "Paramajor Fourth" and "Parminor Fifth" for [[11/8]] and [[16/11]] respectively, and that I also use the terms "Paraminor Fourth" and "Paramajor Fifth" for [[128/99]] and [[99/64]] respectively.  Two 11/8 intervals add up to [[121/64]], which I classify as a certain type of major seventh, though we would need a prefix to distinguish this from the 243/128 major seventh.  Similarly to the naming scheme involving whole tones and semitones, two instances of the [[33/32]] interval, which I call the "Parachromatic quartertone" or the "Parasuperprime", add up to [[1089/1024]], which I call the "parapotome", which, together with 128/121- the "Alpharabian limma" add up to the diatonic [[9/8]] whole tone.  In terms of quartertones, the Alpharabian limma can be broken down into a single instance of 33/32 plus [[4096/3993]], which I .  Truth be told, I'm familiar with both 24edo and 159edo, so I can envision it either way.  Also, in all honesty, I'm curious as to what you think about my current naming scheme for [[Alpharabian tuning]], as the the 11-prime is really good for establishing quartertones, even if you also have to use the 3-prime to do it, and of course, I'm treating the terms "Paramajor" and "Paraminor" in much same way that "Major and "Minor" are treated in your system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
+:::: First off, I can tell you that I've already named 1771561/1769472 the [[Nexus comma]].  I can also say that I personally use the terms "Paramajor Fourth" and "Parminor Fifth" for [[11/8]] and [[16/11]] respectively, and that I also use the terms "Paraminor Fourth" and "Paramajor Fifth" for [[128/99]] and [[99/64]] respectively.  Two 11/8 intervals add up to [[121/64]], which I classify as a certain type of major seventh, though we would need a prefix to distinguish this from the 243/128 major seventh.  Similarly to the naming scheme involving whole tones and semitones, two instances of the [[33/32]] interval, which I call the "Parachromatic quartertone" or the "Parasuperprime", add up to [[1089/1024]], which I call the "parapotome", which, together with 128/121- the "Alpharabian limma" add up to the diatonic [[9/8]] whole tone.  In terms of quartertones, the Alpharabian limma can be broken down into a single instance of 33/32 plus [[4096/3993]], which I call the "Paradiatonic quartertone".  Truth be told, I'm familiar with both 24edo and 159edo, so I can envision it either way.  Also, in all honesty, I'm curious as to what you think about my current naming scheme for [[Alpharabian tuning]], as the the 11-prime is really good for establishing quartertones, even if you also have to use the 3-prime to do it, and of course, I'm treating the terms "Paramajor" and "Paraminor" in much same way that "Major and "Minor" are treated in your system. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:42, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 :::: Oh, and yes, I should have said [[27/16]] rather than 32/27.  My bad, I guess I was thinking about the chain of [[128/121]] diatonic semitones. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)